[bitfolk] 64-bit support

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
Subject: [bitfolk] 64-bit support
c OS X 10.8;
    rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <50784356.7000708@???>
    <420649644.13681.1350085081484@???>
    <20121012235715.GN11377@???>
    <507C7A65.9070906@???>
In-Reply-To: <507C7A65.9070906@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Whitelisted: Authenticated sender, whitelisted
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Tue,
    16 Oct 2012 06:48:27 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 41.76.209.65
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: peet@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS3741 41.76.208.0/21
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED
    shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at
    http://www.dnswl.org/, *      medium trust
    *      [41.76.209.65 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Online backup providers
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:48:30 -0000


On 2012/10/15 11:04 PM, Ian wrote:

> Amazon Glacier sounds good, but if you ever want to see the data again,
> it rapidly gets much, much more expensive.


You have to decide if it's worth it. I've only once had to restore from
backups (my mac, had to fall back to previous OS release). Local
Time-Machine backup though.

> So while users will come and go, you're fine as long as half the
> userbase or their discs don't vanish overnight, and you get 1Mb of
> 'free' backup for every 2Mb of disc space you allow the system to use.
> You can also pay for backup space.


Why not host disk space (only for yourself) at home? Even here (in ZA)
an uncapped account is not that expensive. Slow, yes - I've got the
1Mbit account (though I have pulled the full 4Mbit line capacity during
night-time).

Do you have an always-on fileserver/gateway at home? Plug in an external
1/2/3TB disk (whatever you fancy), open up rsyncd on it, firewall it to
be only accessible from your vps. There you go. Backups might be a bit
slow, yes, especially the initial one, but it will be there.

Unless of course your data is so volatile it cannot be backed up over
such a slow link overnight.


From barry.watson23@??? Tue Oct 16 13:07:08 2012
Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com ([209.85.214.176])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <barry.watson23@???>)
    id 1TO6rU-0001CO-41
    for users@???; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:07:08 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id x4so7933005obh.21
    for <users@???>; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:07:00 -07