iv><br></d=
iv><div>Barry</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>
--bcaec54b53b462b47e04cc2cd4a8--
From simon@??? Tue Oct 16 13:30:39 2012
Received: from mail.calmblue.net ([92.243.6.179])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <simon@???>) id 1TO7EE-0002Qb-9q
for users@???; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:30:38 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.129] (mail.isewi.org [81.187.17.242])
by mail.calmblue.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A483EC5
for <users@???>; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:08:32 +0200 (CEST)
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.0.4 mail.calmblue.net 02A483EC5
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=calmblue.net;
s=default; t=1350392913;
bh=nLKDCjnNU472aMi0b0GcZBOuqWVI+7eF+56MTIVrAWE=;
h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:
In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
b=bNCgIpvtOfHQHtRBk4ibYscAhprluLl3cLoeDbIb4gdmeJi57s401WSvqQyu/NC2M
gcVRUrV4y9C4GT7EfyofpQZPqTkRaCzcOkC/FLb30ekvaUlqXf0P71cQv7yPWzzIId
6xIfFdvYZH7YFeEYqgKjDmUe3WbBco/Ad+GSMpmw=
Message-ID: <507D5C4D.8000501@???>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:08:29 +0100
From: Simon Bell <simon@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <CA+q7HTwsEfGBwXVW9xANKWXSW8DB2uao+pjc5LekZC5gzYvP-w@???>
In-Reply-To: <CA+q7HTwsEfGBwXVW9xANKWXSW8DB2uao+pjc5LekZC5gzYvP-w@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Tue,
16 Oct 2012 13:30:38 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 92.243.6.179
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: simon@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS29169 92.243.0.0/19
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] iptables front-end?
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:30:40 -0000
On 16/10/12 14:07, Barry Watson wrote:
> Hey there list,
>
> I'd be grateful if someone could recommend please a front-end for
> iptables? Arno's iptables seems well-regarded.
>
> I've set up some basic iptables rules on my VPS that allow/block
> various ports etc but want to be able to use iptable's state module
> too and would like to use a script that's been proved through use.
>
> Thanks in advance for any help/ideas.
>
> Barry
>
UFW
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UFW
I like this
From daniel.neri@??? Tue Oct 16 13:41:33 2012
Received: from mail-la0-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <daniel.neri@???>)
id 1TO7Om-00036K-6c
for users@???; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:41:33 +0000
Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id
