On 24/05/12 14:13, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If you're a customer running Debian or Ubuntu then you're most
> likely making use of our apt-cacher. The apt-cacher is quite an old
> version, has a few small problems, and doesn't support IPv6.
>
> I'm looking to replace it with apt-cacher-ng but I'd like to test it
> some more first.
>
> If you'd like to help test it, please could you replace any instance
> of "apt-cacher" in your /etc/apt/sources.list with "test-cacher"?
>
> e.g.
>
> deb http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main
>
> becomes:
>
> deb http://test-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main
wheezy works, but wheezy/updates (or wheezy-updates) doesn't. Then
again, the updates weren't there on apt-cacher either. Should the
Wheezy updates repository be there, or am I doing something wrong? I've
got this in sources.list:
deb http://test-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/
wheezy main non-free contrib
deb http://test-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/
wheezy/updates main non-free contrib
cheers
Chris
--
Chris Dennis cgdennis@???
Fordingbridge, Hampshire, UK
From andy@??? Thu May 24 13:51:32 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1SXYRw-00066W-IP
for users@???; Thu, 24 May 2012 13:51:32 +0000
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 13:51:32 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120524135132.GV12360@???>
References: <20120524131344.GS12360@???>
<4FBE39C0.5010804@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="S4+Kf2w4CfEO117G"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4FBE39C0.5010804@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
24 May 2012 13:51:32 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Testing out apt-cacher-ng for Debian/Ubuntu package
caching
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 13:51:32 -0000
--S4+Kf2w4CfEO117G
