8481.J6sY1ouCejqxnbZWprcmu
dO9KpZHSEL10zbXihXMJDVca09fMXCNPrvZBTywN8CBrw_XPGw33OWfJs.bR
SzSn._ORY9D9qWRCKr94Oe_zCK3.al6AUCRsZRMxHOwDPMvmFmr2jfR07XDO
4EchTHwER8GGo_0od__Q_f2.SiXo4K5H31.hoOR.Guecvrlnec6Se4oN2OLR
5RnuX0kNAh_O7h_DntZR7jurS8q6HoHJKpgchQtC_F76lKbV98uGg7C1EuMy
KmFeLDr1_0GKfinSF_g6MmFo-
X-Yahoo-SMTP: frT3FcGswBDW5RqBrlkG6ccFTpQ9vcvxzPWsyWPsU_yJq6xb
Received: from [192.168.1.7] (cgdennis@78.32.16.193 with plain)
by smtp822.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 May 2012 06:38:09 -0700 PDT
Message-ID: <4FBE39C0.5010804@???>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:38:08 +0100
From: Chris Dennis <cgdennis@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
rv:11.0) Gecko/20120406 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <20120524131344.GS12360@???>
In-Reply-To: <20120524131344.GS12360@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
24 May 2012 13:38:15 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 77.238.189.65
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: cgdennis@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS34010 77.238.188.0/22
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at
http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust
* [77.238.189.65 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Testing out apt-cacher-ng for Debian/Ubuntu package
caching
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 13:38:16 -0000
On 24/05/12 14:13, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If you're a customer running Debian or Ubuntu then you're most
> likely making use of our apt-cacher. The apt-cacher is quite an old
> version, has a few small problems, and doesn't support IPv6.
>
> I'm looking to replace it with apt-cacher-ng but I'd like to test it
> some more first.
>
> If you'd like to help test it, please could you replace any instance
> of "apt-cacher" in your /etc/apt/sources.list with "test-cacher"?
>
> e.g.
>
> deb http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main
>
> becomes:
>
> deb http://test-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main
wheezy works, but wheezy/updates (or wheezy-updates) doesn't. Then
again, the updates weren't there on apt-cacher either. Should the
Wheezy updates repository be there, or am I doing something wrong? I've
got this in sources.list:
deb http://test-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/
wheezy main non-free contrib
deb http://test-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/
wheezy/updates main non-free contrib
cheers
Chris
--
Chris Dennis cgdennis@???
Fordingbridge, Hampshire, UK
From andy@??? Thu May 24 13:51:32 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1SXYRw-00066W-IP
for users@???; Thu, 24 May 2012 13:51:32 +0000
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 13:51:32 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120524135132.GV12360@???>
References: <20120524131344.GS12360@???>
<4FBE39C0.5010804@
