folk.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
25 May 2012 10:01:19 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 217.12.10.251
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: cgdennis@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15635 217.12.0.0/20
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at
http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust
* [217.12.10.251 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Testing out apt-cacher-ng for Debian/Ubuntu package
caching
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 10:01:20 -0000
Thank you for your patient and comprehensive answer, Andy.
I hadn't comprehended the difference between /updates and -updates before.
On 24/05/12 14:51, Andy Smith wrote:
> ...
> A sources.list for squeeze looks like this:
>
> deb http://test-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main
> deb http://test-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-updates main
> deb http://test-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
>
> Replace "squeeze" with "wheezy" for yours (and add on non-free,
> contrib etc. if you like).
Yes, except that wheezy doesn't have wheezy-updates yet, only
wheezy-proposed-updates.
cheers
Chris
--
Chris Dennis cgdennis@???
Fordingbridge, Hampshire, UK
From spw+lists@??? Fri May 25 13:30:13 2012
Received: from mx.sdf.org ([192.94.73.19] helo=sdf.lonestar.org ident=root)
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <spw+lists@???>) id 1SXuaq-0003JL-Fb
for users@???; Fri, 25 May 2012 13:30:13 +0000
Received: from localhost (IDENT:spw@??? [192.94.73.5])
by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q4PD9feo023780;
Fri, 25 May 2012 13:09:41 GMT
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 13:09:41 +0000 (UTC)
From: Sean Whitton <spw+lists@???>
X-X-Sender: spw@???
To: Hugo Mills <hugo-bf@???>
In-Reply-To: <20120524200233.GE31037@???>
Message-ID: <alpine.NEB.2.00.1205251309140.5030@???>
References: <20120524131344.GS12360@???>
<20120524200233.GE31037@???>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (NEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
25 May 2012 13:30:13 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.94.73.19
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: spw+lists@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS14361 192.94.73.0/24
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches
handover relay * domain
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Cc: users@???,
Andy Smith <andy@???>
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Testing out apt-cacher-ng for Debian/Ubuntu package
caching
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Sean Whitton <spw@???>
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 13:30:15 -0000
On Thu, 24 May 2012, Hugo Mills wrote:
> Due to a slight case of using the wrong xterm, I managed to switch
> over my desktop machine at home instead of my VPS. I'm happy to report
> that it currently works quite cheerfully from an arbitrary location on
> the internet. :)
Surely the apt-cacher is restricted to the BitFolk LAN. Are you using
running your Internet down a VPN to your VPS?
Sean
From andy@??? Fri May 25 13:32:42 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1SXudG-0003YY-Be
for users@???; Fri, 25 May 2012 13:32:42 +0000
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 13:32:42 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120525133242.GT3867@???>
Refere
