Re: [bitfolk] IMPORTANT: You need to renumber the IP address…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Jan Henkins
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] IMPORTANT: You need to renumber the IP address(es)ofyour BitFolk VPS
------1720CFFOLY2VHIE4DZPJ3EJV7S10HW
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8

Thanks everyone. We seem to have a winner :-)

I'm looking for a new provid=
er after a profoundly unsatisfying support experience from 123 Reg after th=
ey bought out Supanames.

My POP3 email collection was failing on a works-o=
ne-time-in-five basis. I made clear I was using Linux and included server s=
ettings, asking them to verify they were still valid after the migration. I=
received a very short response telling me to check my server settings and =
including a document about how to configure IMAP on Outlook.

Ask the best,=

Paul

--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brev=
ity.
------1720CFFOLY2VHIE4DZPJ3EJV7S10HW
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks everyone. We seem to have a winner :-)<br>
<br>
I&#39;m looking for=
a new provider after a profoundly unsatisfying support experience from 123=
Reg after they bought out Supanames.<br>
<br>
My POP3 email collection was=
failing on a works-one-time-in-five basis. I made clear I was using Linux =
and included server settings, asking them to verify they were still valid a=
fter the migration. I received a very short response telling me to check my=
server settings and including a document about how to configure IMAP on Ou=
tlook.<br>
<br>
Ask the best, <br>
Paul<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Andro=
id phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
------1720CFFOLY2VHIE4DZPJ3EJV7S10HW--



From dee@??? Wed Apr 25 17:30:23 2012
Received: from backup.mail.bitfolk.com ([2607:f2f8:a104::25])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <dee@???>) id 1SN62p-0005Hc-2z
    for users@???; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:30:23 +0000
Received: from [2001:ba8:1f1:f0db:216:5eff:fe00:159] (helo=jane.earlsoft.co.uk)
    by backup.mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <dee@???>) id 1SN5a8-0007EH-OG
    for users@???; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:00:45 +0000
Received: from [10.133.165.205] ([212.183.128.97]) (authenticated bits=0)
    by jane.earlsoft.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3PH0aOs006984
    for <users@???>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:00:39 GMT
Message-Id: <201204251700.q3PH0aOs006984@???>
To: users@???
From: "=?utf-8?B?RGVhbm5hIEVhcmxleQ==?=" <dee@???>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:00:39 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    boundary="----=_Part_0_1335373240011"
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3
    (jane.earlsoft.co.uk [85.119.83.77]);
    Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:00:41 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
    shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run,
    due to a shortcircuited rule
    * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-backup.mail.bitfolk.com-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+)
X-backup.mail.bitfolk.com-Spam-Report: No, score=1.4 required=5.0
    autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1; 
    pts rule name              description
    0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
    1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
    0.1 FROM_EXCESS_BASE64     From: base64 encoded unnecessarily
    Scanned on host budvar.bitfolk.com on Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:00:45 +0000.
    If you have any query please contact postmaster@???
X-backup.mail.bitfolk.com-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on
    backup.mail.bitfolk.com at Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:00:45 +0000
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
    25 Apr 2012 17:30:23 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2607:f2f8:a104::25
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dee@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] =?utf-8?q?Domain_registrar?=
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:30:23 -0000


------=_Part_0_1335373240011
Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

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