On Sun, 13 May 2012 06:07:46 +0100
Keith Williams <keithwilliamsnp@???> wrote:
> I apologise for the simplistic question - put it down to the fact
> that I reached 63 this week.
no excuse, you are a mere youngster compared to some of us ;-)
--
John Lewis
Debian & the GeneWeb genealogical data server
From announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@??? Fri May 18 10:56:04 2012
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bitfolk.com)
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from
<announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???>)
id 1SVKqp-0004fD-TS
for users@???; Fri, 18 May 2012 10:56:03 +0000
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1SVKqk-0004e8-3x
for announce@???; Fri, 18 May 2012 10:55:58 +0000
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 10:55:58 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: announce@???
Message-ID: <20120518105558.GF12360@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
18 May 2012 10:55:58 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-BeenThere: announce@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0664894710=="
Sender: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
Errors-To: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by C
