e like it, it's fairly easy to use and you've got lots of
> control. A vast improvement on 123-reg.
>
> Portfast.co.uk are also supposed to be good.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Matthew Moore
> Surgical Materials Testing Laboratory
> System Administrator
> Telephone: +44 (0)1656 752165
> Email: matt@???
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@???
> https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users
From announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@??? Fri Apr 27 20:03:44 2012
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bitfolk.com)
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from
<announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???>)
id 1SNrOK-0006Tr-7A
for users@???; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:03:44 +0000
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1SNrOG-0006Sr-UW
for announce@???; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:03:41 +0000
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:03:40 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: announce@???
Message-ID: <20120427200340.GM3867@???>
References: <20120426141747.GH12360@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20120426141747.GH12360@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
27 Apr 2012 20:03:40 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-BeenThere: announce@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0968220505=="
Sender: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
Errors-To: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
27 Apr 2012 20:03:44 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Ubuntu 12.04 (Precise Pangolin) release today
X-BeenThere: users@???
Reply-To: users@???
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:03:44 -0000
--===============0968220505==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="z4+8/lEcDcG5Ke9S"
Content-Disposition: inline
--z4+8/lEcDcG5Ke9S
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 02:17:47PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> In the next few days I hope to be able to add 12.04 to the net
> installer:
>
> https://tools.bitfolk.com/wiki/Using_the_self-serve_net_installer
I've added it now. I did a test install and it boots, so I've no
reason to believe that it will behave any differently to 12.04 on
bare metal.
I still haven't tested an upgrade from 10.04.x to 12.04 yet. Again
I've no reason to believe there would be problems, but would still
be interested in any reports of success or failure.
The Ubuntu mirrors are still really slow at the moment. It might
help that I've warmed t
