Re: [bitfolk] does bitfolk block smtp from t-mobile ip addre…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Bitfolk
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] does bitfolk block smtp from t-mobile ip addresses?
ase do log in and vote it up if you are interested in it. I will
> try to revisit the subject with my accountants if interest is shown.


Great stuff. Done.


Andy
=2D-=20
Dr Andy Parkins
andyparkins@???

--nextPart8042156.Bc1vT0CkTC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk91kKoACgkQwQJ9gE9xL22c2wCfXfChrKBEM8gZLdyd4dCaAgMA
1pUAnRFpLMcNtyCwp2dkbqkpy6C0Chyp
=r9f+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart8042156.Bc1vT0CkTC--


From duane@??? Fri Mar 30 11:47:28 2012
Received: from mail.aus-biz.com ([208.82.100.153])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <duane@???>) id 1SDaIh-0001j8-9Q
    for users@???; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:47:28 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.141] (220-245-82-41.static.tpgi.com.au
    [220.245.82.41])
    (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
    (Client did not present a certificate)
    by mail.aus-biz.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E965FF28A
    for <users@???>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:37:20 +1100 (EST)
Message-ID: <4F759AEC.7060601@???>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:37:16 +1100
From: Duane <duane@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
    rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <201203300952.59944.andyparkins@???>
    <20120330101014.GS4154@???>
In-Reply-To: <20120330101014.GS4154@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
    30 Mar 2012 11:47:27 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 208.82.100.153
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: duane@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS36252 208.82.96.0/21
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL shortcircuit=no
    autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: *  0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Bitcoin as payment method
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:47:28 -0000


On 03/30/12 21:10, Andy Smith wrote:
> =85unfortunately BitFolk's accountant doesn't really know how to make=20
> sense of it. The concept of virtual currencies strikes fear ,=20
> uncertainty and doubt into their hearts, not joy. I don't really want=20
> to push them over it at the moment.


From an accounting point of view it should be treated no differently=20
than accepting say euros in physical currency, and you get taxed on any=20
profit, or claim a loss, from the exchange rate conversion back into=20
what ever currency you usually trade in.

The key so you don't loose out too much would be to have an account with=20
an exchanger so you can flip things over quickly as bitcoin isn't mature=20
enough yet to be a stable currency so there just as much potential for=20
loss or gain which could hurt a small enterprise as it may become a=20
large percentage of your business due to not having any middle men to=20
take their pound of flesh from the transaction.


From duane@??? Sat Mar 31 05:04:07 2012
Received: from mail.aus-biz.com ([208.82.100.153])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <duane@???>) id 1SDqTt-0004AH-8K
    for users@???; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 05:04:06 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.141] (220-245-82-41.static.tpgi.com.au
    [220.245.82.41])
    (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
    (Client did not present a certificate)
    by mail.aus-biz.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CB7CFF28A
    for <users@???>; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:04:00 +1100 (EST)
Message-ID: <4F76903A.2010905@???>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:03:54 +1100
From: Duane <duane@e