Re: [bitfolk] does bitfolk block smtp from t-mobile ip addre…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Daniel Case
Date: 2011-10-27 14:28 -000
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] does bitfolk block smtp from t-mobile ip addresses?
--nextPart8042156.Bc1vT0CkTC
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2012 March 30 Friday, Andy Smith wrote:

> In theory I'm completely happy with it, and am even a little bit
> into bitcoin myself =E2=80=94 I have 10.23 BTC in my wallet. :)


Ha. I knew I was right about you chaps -- forward thinking all the time :-)

> =E2=80=A6unfortunately BitFolk's accountant doesn't really know how to ma=

ke
> sense of it. The concept of virtual currencies strikes fear ,
> uncertainty and doubt into their hearts, not joy. I don't really
> want to push them over it at the moment.


That's fair and sensible enough. As I say: it's certainly not a deal break=
er=20
for me; and certainly not in the case of a company as good as you are.

I don't know it it helps but I've heard that Mt.Gox have a checkout system=
=20
either out or coming out soon that allows your webservice to quote a price =
in=20
fiat (GBP for you I guess), have it settled in bitcoins and then have them=
=20
instantly converted back to fiat for delivery to you. In that case, from t=
he=20
point of view of the accountant, it's just another paypal, price in pounds,=
=20
payment in pounds -- bitcoin was just the transfer mechanism.

> There has been a feature request for this for some time (but it was
> created by me!):
>=20
>     https://tools.bitfolk.com/redmine/issues/63
>=20
> Please do log in and vote it up if you are interested in it. I will
> try to revisit the subject with my accountants if interest is shown.


Great stuff. Done.


Andy
=2D-=20
Dr Andy Parkins
andyparkins@???

--nextPart8042156.Bc1vT0CkTC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk91kKoACgkQwQJ9gE9xL22c2wCfXfChrKBEM8gZLdyd4dCaAgMA
1pUAnRFpLMcNtyCwp2dkbqkpy6C0Chyp
=r9f+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart8042156.Bc1vT0CkTC--


From duane@??? Fri Mar 30 11:47:28 2012
Received: from mail.aus-biz.com ([208.82.100.153])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <duane@???>) id 1SDaIh-0001j8-9Q
    for users@???; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:47:28 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.141] (220-245-82-41.static.tpgi.com.au
    [220.245.82.41])
    (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
    (Client did not present a certificate)
    by mail.aus-biz.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E965FF28A
    for <users@???>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:37:20 +1100 (EST)
Message-ID: <4F759AEC.7060601@???>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:37:16 +1100
From: Duane <duane@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
    rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <201203300952.59944.andyparkins@???>
    <20120330101014.GS4154@???>
In-Reply-To: <20120330101014.GS4154@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-T