Re: [bitfolk] does bitfolk block smtp from t-mobile ip addre…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Joseph Heenan
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] does bitfolk block smtp from t-mobile ip addresses?
nned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
    30 Mar 2012 10:53:43 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 74.125.82.52
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andyparkins@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 74.125.0.0/16
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
    DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
    SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
    low *      trust *      [74.125.82.52 listed in list.dnswl.org]
    * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
    author's *       domain
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
    *  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
    *      valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Bitcoin as payment method
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:53:44 -0000


--nextPart8042156.Bc1vT0CkTC
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2012 March 30 Friday, Andy Smith wrote:

> In theory I'm completely happy with it, and am even a little bit
> into bitcoin myself =E2=80=94 I have 10.23 BTC in my wallet. :)


Ha. I knew I was right about you chaps -- forward thinking all the time :-)

> =E2=80=A6unfortunately BitFolk's accountant doesn't really know how to ma=

ke
> sense of it. The concept of virtual currencies strikes fear ,
> uncertainty and doubt into their hearts, not joy. I don't really
> want to push them over it at the moment.


That's fair and sensible enough. As I say: it's certainly not a deal break=
er=20
for me; and certainly not in the case of a company as good as you are.

I don't know it it helps but I've heard that Mt.Gox have a checkout system=
=20
either out or coming out soon that allows your webservice to quote a price =
in=20
fiat (GBP for you I guess), have it settled in bitcoins and then hav