Re: [bitfolk] does bitfolk block smtp from t-mobile ip addre…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Bitfolk
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] does bitfolk block smtp from t-mobile ip addresses?
-----

--wmhq21yAGFMoSpeN--


From andyparkins@??? Fri Mar 30 10:53:44 2012
Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <andyparkins@???>)
    id 1SDZSh-0007zh-Mf
    for users@???; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:53:44 +0000
Received: by wgbgn7 with SMTP id gn7so419228wgb.21
    for <users@???>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
    h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
    :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
    bh=8VjjNTmJWhReCn3r9x9D3RUUTAylpNCl85kHzCT92mo=;
    b=rrAOkPnqDE+NPmQSfmU53FaodiVDababceKhwA9OUIyZoqP7Vr1AToGlOw51/e1JKb
    rgm2QM1FRklRpD10m8UdUZS4xsZJbfHVoovm7aG2H9wf55u5mB7jrUTCEWNWwnvYvaDw
    tO6+sP3WUW+6BqPltRJPDR5+JDs3KX7Wvrqcr6zc37j7yr7xb8tPLrxqAF1YXucjgCLf
    Yvz9Nx+oxp4XW8b5jPbXO1ZOeF19anuIIoHpCBuinrHwBiRiAttPT/OziO/bR7XdHXzo
    fzuVX9hTVJAUiwUxmC8ghaNX1dS5Y19rF7vhz9E800nyHTGtpLPcXyj5EMirc5eejA3b
    JCnA==
Received: by 10.180.85.69 with SMTP id f5mr5219228wiz.18.1333104817622;
    Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dvr.localnet (mail.360visiontechnology.com. [92.42.121.178])
    by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6sm5372591wix.8.2012.03.30.03.53.35
    (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
    Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@???>
To: users@???
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:53:30 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.0.0-1-686-pae; KDE/4.6.3; i686; ; )
References: <201203300952.59944.andyparkins@???>
    <20120330101014.GS4154@???>
In-Reply-To: <20120330101014.GS4154@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8042156.Bc1vT0CkTC";
    protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201203301153.34756.andyparkins@???>
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
    30 Mar 2012 10:53:43 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 74.125.82.52
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andyparkins@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 74.125.0.0/16
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
    DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
    SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
    low *      trust *      [74.125.82.52 listed in list.dnswl.org]
    * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
    author's *       domain
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
    *  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
    *      valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Bitcoin as payment method
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:53:44 -0000


--nextPart8042156.Bc1vT0CkTC
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2012 March 30 Friday, Andy Smith wrote:

> In theory I'm completely happy with it, and am even a little bit
> into bitcoin myself =E2=80=94 I have 10.23 BTC in my wallet. :)


Ha. I knew I was right about you chaps -- forward thinking all the time :-)

> =E2=80=A6unfortunately BitFolk's accountant doesn't really know how to ma=

ke
> sense of it. The concept of virtual currencies strikes fear ,
> uncertainty and doubt into their hearts, not joy. I don't really
> want to push them over it at the moment.


That's fai