at,
11 Feb 2012 19:09:27 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.83.38
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ian@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] IP address at Nominet's nameservers is wrong
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:09:28 -0000
Mathew said:
>>> Alternatively, there might be workarounds e.g. listing a slightly
>>> different dns name in the short-term e.g. sub1 or top1 in both DNS and
>>> delegation and changing it back a bit later.
>>
>> This is what I am going to try next.
>
> Whilst it was some time ago, I do seem to recall I once had to do this in
> similar circumstances with 123-reg. It seemed that if you were merely
> changing the IP address of a glue record then their system did not detect
> the change hence nothing was done. Instead I had to temporarily remove the
> delegation with the (old) glue record, let that ripple through, and then
> add it back in with the new IP address. It didn't affect resolution in the
> interim given I had the second authoritative nameserver still being
> referenced.
First go and the Nominet computer says:
Name servers:
ns1.example.co.uk 85.119.83.xx
ns2.example.co.uk 212.13.195.yy
Argh!
Second go, with two names that definitely had not been used ever before:
Name servers:
ffs.example.co.uk 85.119.83.xx
wtf.example.co.uk 85.119.83.yy
Finally...
Ian
From andy@??? Sat Feb 11 19:19:46 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1RwIU6-0005vZ-GI
for users@???; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:19:46 +0000
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:19:46 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120211191946.GG23380@???>
References: <4F352183.4070708@???>
<2AEAD09C-4403-484D-95BB-D0B313FC5DCD@???>
<4F354B64.7040405@???> <4F35596E.3000906@???>
<4F364EB3.3000604@???>
<85f2071f1be555fe6f6a47eb6bafbb58.squirrel@???>
<4F36BCE3.7080905@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="N709L9vpgywc1qLv"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F36BCE3.7
