world without hate. And I can picture us attacking =
that world, because they'd never expect it.</p><p style=3D"margin-botto=
m:0cm">
- Jack Handey</p></div><div><br></div><div>=A0</div>
<div>=A0</div><br>
--f46d040169f1473f9a04b8b41b23--
From ian@??? Sat Feb 11 19:09:27 2012
Received: from semi-divine.com ([85.119.83.38] helo=topcat.semi-divine.com)
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <ian@???>) id 1RwIK7-0004yP-Ti
for users@???; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:09:27 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.23]
(cpc3-nwrk4-2-0-cust250.12-1.cable.virginmedia.com [86.26.44.251])
by topcat.semi-divine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88CE084475
for <users@???>; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:09:24 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4F36BCE3.7080905@???>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:09:23 +0000
From: Ian <ian@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bitfolk Users <users@???>
References: <4F352183.4070708@???>
<2AEAD09C-4403-484D-95BB-D0B313FC5DCD@???>
<4F354B64.7040405@???> <4F35596E.3000906@???>
<4F364EB3.3000604@???>
<85f2071f1be555fe6f6a47eb6bafbb58.squirrel@???>
In-Reply-To: <85f2071f1be555fe6f6a47eb6bafbb58.squirrel@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sat,
11 Feb 2012 19:09:27 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.83.38
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ian@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] IP address at Nominet's nameservers is wrong
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:09:28 -0000
Mathew said:
>>> Alternatively, there might be workarounds e.g. listing a slightly
>>> different dns name in the short-term e.g. sub1 or top1 in both DNS and
>>> delegation and changing it back a bit later.
>>
>> This is what I am going to try next.
>
> Whilst it was some time ago, I do seem to recall I once had to do this in
> similar circumstances with 123-reg. It seemed that if you were merely
> changing the IP address of a glue record then their system did not detect
> the change hence nothing was done. Instead I had to temporarily remove the
> delegation with the (old) glue record, let that ripple through, and then
> add it back in with the new IP address. It didn't affect resolution in the
> interim given I had the second authoritative nameserver still being
> referenced.
First go and the Nomin
