1163138.GV32046@???>
<CALdaYd2FnyfHjn1b9CJ=RMeXXhomnmnnj4L3UoYjfDgJRmgthg@???>
<FA9E2C79-5B6B-4FF8-8F94-0D1310119158@???>
From: Daniel Case <danielcase10@???>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:04:56 +0000
Message-ID: <CALdaYd32+2V4PuUMO0qKTOvW8h5Ki-CJSPgU0fBHn=DES1fKfA@???>
To: Johnathon <kirrus@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sat,
11 Feb 2012 17:05:22 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.215.48
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielcase10@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust * [209.85.215.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Cc: "users@???" <users@???>,
Andy Smith <andy@???>
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Tor Obsfucation
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:05:22 -0000
Can't quite get it compiled on my system, it seems to be falling over
on the "make" command, is anyone good with C here?
I followed the instructions in the comments (to do with libevent) and
had the very same problem with libcrypto, but used the same CFLAGS and
LIBS line and it configured correctly.
(
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/5009)
The problem I'm having now is when I try to "make" it's throwing this
back at me:
src/crypt.c:196: error: implicit declaration of function =E2RAND_bytes=E2
Hugo, I did have an exit node (and policy) running, which means anyone
who connects to Tor can go through my server... yes some people use it
for bad things but I think the majority of the tor traffic is from
internet-censored countries without freedom of speech. Tor is
encrypted by nature to stop eavesdropping and make
people truely anonymous.
From andy@??? Sat Feb 11 17:07:07 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1RwGPj-0007aO-O7
for users@???; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:07:07 +0000
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:07:07 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120211170707.GX32046@???>
References: <CALdaYd06o3HAm_p+C7Qn87FJJbBftEiEm1FMBs_dDf4PkNF5yA@???>
<20120211152619.GF23380@???>
<CALdaYd3_K6W9s-E7ErUY68xXqFsB3rZxWEFCDAGBbvYRd+3CpA@???>
<20120211163138.GV32046@???>
<CALdaYd2FnyfHjn1b9CJ=RMeXXhomnmnnj4L3UoYjfDgJRmgthg@???>
<FA9E2C79-5B6B-4FF8-8F94-0D1310119158@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/7AFTq66AsXNQ7GX"
Content-Disposition: inline
In
