[bitfolk] Small amounts of RAM missing - any ideas?

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
Subject: [bitfolk] Small amounts of RAM missing - any ideas?
___________________
> users mailing list
> users@???
> https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users



From danielcase10@??? Sat Feb 11 17:05:22 2012
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <danielcase10@???>)
    id 1RwGO2-0007OO-89
    for users@???; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:05:22 +0000
Received: by lagw12 with SMTP id w12so4554493lag.21
    for <users@???>; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:05:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
    h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
    :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
    bh=X6HcdlfID9YY1VCEy1EdqhBGELiHzMjGHJbdOXUwSi0=;
    b=GUxczbM8s2dFEl+LzKYC4Qt+5/fYgBeVHW7FapiOb+vBDECONTpnuZCDEDDvs3C2E5
    Ev9ytk9kWZHFcMevyZbxtvBAS/exaA8+cfG/A4vpGFdzkAdR5WOcwZmiBoaWdY9YqslN
    /RoPs94V05RiEVeQTWt9b6KKm04NNmGN3O9PA=
Received: by 10.112.85.199 with SMTP id j7mr3625738lbz.26.1328979916118; Sat,
    11 Feb 2012 09:05:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.112.232 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:04:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <FA9E2C79-5B6B-4FF8-8F94-0D1310119158@???>
References: <CALdaYd06o3HAm_p+C7Qn87FJJbBftEiEm1FMBs_dDf4PkNF5yA@???>
    <20120211152619.GF23380@???>
    <CALdaYd3_K6W9s-E7ErUY68xXqFsB3rZxWEFCDAGBbvYRd+3CpA@???>
    <20120211163138.GV32046@???>
    <CALdaYd2FnyfHjn1b9CJ=RMeXXhomnmnnj4L3UoYjfDgJRmgthg@???>
    <FA9E2C79-5B6B-4FF8-8F94-0D1310119158@???>
From: Daniel Case <danielcase10@???>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:04:56 +0000
Message-ID: <CALdaYd32+2V4PuUMO0qKTOvW8h5Ki-CJSPgU0fBHn=DES1fKfA@???>
To: Johnathon <kirrus@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sat,
    11 Feb 2012 17:05:22 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.215.48
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielcase10@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
    DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
    SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
    low *      trust *      [209.85.215.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
    * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
    author's *       domain
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
    *  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
    *      valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 J