--YzytRCpZNWCht94M
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi Daniel,
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 03:39:25PM +0000, Daniel Case wrote:
> I already run an exit node, I think we discussed it a while ago, I've
> taken it down for now while I try to set a bridge up for Iranian
> internet users
What changes then, just because some Iranians may or may not be
using it. i.e. why are you asking this now?
> Do I still need to block 22 and 25 for a bridge?
A bridge doesn't send packets to the non-Tor Internet so I don't
think it matters what your exit policy is in that case. I'm not even
sure a bridge can have an exit policy, since it isn't an exit..
Cheers,
Andy
--YzytRCpZNWCht94M
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAk82l+oACgkQIJm2TL8VSQuacACeMrdb4Byk+89OMIixp6j0A2AM
fQEAn1ImVrOGF2YHvAhq2RAEhK0kOY00
=YpMd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--YzytRCpZNWCht94M--
From andy@??? Sat Feb 11 16:37:21 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1RwFwu-0005Zx-Oz
for users@???; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:37:21 +0000
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:37:20 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120211163720.GW32046@???>
References: <CALdaYd06o3HAm_p+C7Qn87FJJbBftEiEm1FMBs_dDf4PkNF5yA@???>
<20120211152619.GF23380@???>
<CALdaYd3_K6W9s-E7ErUY68xXqFsB3rZxWEFCDAGBbvYRd+3CpA@???>
<20120211163138.GV32046@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6s/G0Ait2f6IH9MX"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120211163138.GV32046@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sat,
11 Feb 2012 16:37:20 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Tor Obsfucation
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:37:21 -0000
--6s/G0Ait2f6IH9MX
Co
