te requested)
by secure.newtonnet.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2186A0186
for <users@???>; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:03:34 +0000 (GMT)
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.6.0 secure.newtonnet.co.uk B2186A0186
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=newtonnet.co.uk;
s=2011; t=1328954614; bh=xijLV9Zd/CT6Kbc5R3UXg+Sydk5t/azfaVQvCienYM
s=; h=References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:Subject:From:Date:To:Message-ID; b=gEHWE
deTuZ+lT8L71RFVl9EBnSSyaGi2ce3xwjrKrJ4/jKF+d8ryPRSOsZlEpjhX0sr/G1rK
ySu1XcDbPsBcngx/dhS761lA8G+cezvOe2hSxLf0KBSCHB0n5YDNAt9tQ/wCDGk5cin
Y9eIqJKndkzfEkbKK0gczI/ocfErmBek=
References: <CAMe3QpNkapO8GdRjBEBDibvP4x6wmEJsUgRoYDxwZO75icwGGA@???>
<4F3569B5.7050405@???>
<E87949CB-8878-43BC-A668-B720B855301F@???>
<CAMe3QpPVc2+hOBMv3Y3SPgndOuQh_UE3299uZreE-WZdDTHdWQ@???>
<20120210192342.GC23380@???>
<CAMe3QpPuypLZPjTC_U4O1v5q-56J3kjC5MADqDZWifFN=+=0DQ@???>
<247d5e21-7d7b-4478-979b-4ad36478b91c@???>
<4F362317.4020601@???>
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <4F362317.4020601@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
From: "Mathew J. Newton" <bitfolklist@???>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:03:31 +0000
To: users@???
Message-ID: <900b0d73-e389-40cb-a0b6-2e839bb55f4d@???>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-bitfolk.com-Metrics-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for
2001:ba8:1f1:f137::2 (failed)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sat,
11 Feb 2012 10:03:36 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:ba8:1f1:f137::2
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bitfolklist@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule
* -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] DNS hiccups
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:03:36 -0000
John Winters <john@???> wrote:
>And if you go for an independent ISP, even sooner.=20
Oh of course; I was just pointing out that whilst they've not been all th=
at vocal about IPv6 BT have nevertheless been looking at it and customers=
might not have to wait quite as long as one might otherwise be thinking.=
=20
Mathew=20
From ian@??? Sat Feb 11 11:19:20 2012
Received: from semi-divine.com ([85.119.83.38] helo=topcat.semi-divine.com)
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <ian@???>) id 1RwAzA-0000Ri-GT
for users@???; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:19:20 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.23]
(cpc3-nwrk4-2-0-cus
