Hey Andy,
I already run an exit node, I think we discussed it a while ago, I've
taken it down for now while I try to set a bridge up for Iranian
internet users (a few of my friends and I'm going to email torassists
to tell them they can use my IP when giving bridges to Iranian users).
Do I still need to block 22 and 25 for a bridge?
Daniel
From andy@??? Sat Feb 11 16:31:38 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1RwFrO-0005EP-D6
for users@???; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:31:38 +0000
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:31:38 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120211163138.GV32046@???>
References: <CALdaYd06o3HAm_p+C7Qn87FJJbBftEiEm1FMBs_dDf4PkNF5yA@???>
<20120211152619.GF23380@???>
<CALdaYd3_K6W9s-E7ErUY68xXqFsB3rZxWEFCDAGBbvYRd+3CpA@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YzytRCpZNWCht94M"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALdaYd3_K6W9s-E7ErUY68xXqFsB3rZxWEFCDAGBbvYRd+3CpA@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sat,
11 Feb 2012 16:31:38 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Tor Obsfucation
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:31:38 -0000
--YzytRCpZNWCht94M
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi Daniel,
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 03:39:25PM +0000, Daniel Case wrote:
> I already run an exit node, I think we discussed it a while ago, I've
> taken it down for now while I try to set a bridge up for Iranian
> internet users
What changes then, just because some Iranians may or may not be
using it. i.e. why are you asking this now?
> Do I still need to block 22 and 25 for a bridge?
A bridge doesn't send packets to the non-Tor Internet so I don't
think it matters what your exit policy is in that case. I'm not even
sure a bridge can have an exit policy, since it isn't an exit..
Cheers,
Andy
--YzytRCpZNWCht94M
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAk82l+oACgkQIJm2TL8VSQuacACeMrdb4Byk+89OMIixp6j0A2AM
fQEAn1ImVrOGF2YHvAhq2RAEhK0kOY00
=YpMd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--YzytRCpZNWCht94M--
From andy@??? Sat Feb 11 16:37:21 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1RwFwu-0005Zx-Oz
for users@???; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:37:21 +0000
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:37:20 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120211163720.GW32046@???>
References: <CALdaYd06o3HAm_p+C7Qn87FJJbBftEiEm1FMBs_dDf4PkNF5yA@???>
<20120211152619.GF23380@???>
<CALdaYd3_K6W9s-E7ErUY68xXqFsB3rZxWEFCDAGBbvYRd+3CpA@???>
<20120211163138.GV32046@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6s/G0Ait2f6IH9MX"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120211163138.GV32046@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sat,
11 Feb 2012 16:37:20 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Tor Obsfucation
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/user
