Another hobby user here. While it would be a little inconvenient to be cut
off it would be greatly preferable to an enormous bill. I think a
user-configurable limit would be the way forward, if only because you're
likely to get a lot of variation in what people consider an acceptable
point to cut off service. Us personal users will have a different pain
threshold than someone who's got commercial interests, for example.
Regards,
Andy
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 at 11:31 Ole-Morten Duesund <olemd(a)glemt.net> wrote:
On 21. juni 2018 07:17, Sämi Bächler wrote:
Hi Andy
Am 20.06.2018 um 09:14 schrieb john lewis
<zen57162(a)zen.co.uk>uk>:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:33:42 +0100
Steven Walker <sjb.walker(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Speaking as a hobby user who never gets even
close to the limit I
would not want to occur substantial charges and have no problem with
having my service suspended. I would not quibble with having an
extra charge of a month or two. After all it can only be the
customer's fault for not monitoring the usage or reading emails.
I am in a similar position and would not have a problem having my
service suspended
+1
+1 - my only problem is that I'm hosting my mail at my VM, so getting
suspended would be a major inconvenience to say the least.
I should probably make sure I've registered a secondary contact-method.
But as others say, an extra month or two would be fine; a 300 times
increase however would be a problem.
- OM
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)lists.bitfolk.com
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users