Another hobby user here. While it would be a little inconvenient to be cut off it would be greatly preferable to an enormous bill. I think a user-configurable limit would be the way forward, if only because you're likely to get a lot of variation in what people consider an acceptable point to cut off service. Us personal users will have a different pain threshold than someone who's got commercial interests, for example.

Regards,

Andy

On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 at 11:31 Ole-Morten Duesund <olemd@glemt.net> wrote:

On 21. juni 2018 07:17, Sämi Bächler wrote:
> Hi Andy
>
>> Am 20.06.2018 um 09:14 schrieb john lewis <zen57162@zen.co.uk>:
>>
>> On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:33:42 +0100
>> Steven Walker <sjb.walker@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Speaking as a hobby user who never gets even close to the limit I
>>> would not want to occur substantial charges and have no problem with
>>> having my service suspended. I would not quibble with having an
>>> extra charge of a month or two. After all it can only be the
>>> customer's fault for not monitoring the usage or reading emails.
>>>
>>
>> I am in a similar position and would not have a problem having my
>> service suspended
>
> +1

+1 - my only problem is that I'm hosting my mail at my VM, so getting
suspended would be a major inconvenience to say the least.

I should probably make sure I've registered a secondary contact-method.

But as others say, an extra month or two would be fine; a 300 times
increase however would be a problem.

- OM

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.bitfolk.com
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users