19 Jun
2018
19 Jun
'18
5:33 p.m.
Speaking as a hobby user who never gets even close to the limit I would not
want to occur substantial charges and have no problem with having my
service suspended. I would not quibble with having an extra charge of a
month or two. After all it can only be the customer's fault for not
monitoring the usage or reading emails.
Steve
20 Jun
20 Jun
7:14 a.m.
New subject: users Digest, Vol 112, Issue 3
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:33:42 +0100
Steven Walker <sjb.walker(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Speaking as a hobby user who never gets even close to
the limit I
would not want to occur substantial charges and have no problem with
having my service suspended. I would not quibble with having an
extra charge of a month or two. After all it can only be the
customer's fault for not monitoring the usage or reading emails.
I am in a similar position and would not have a problem having my
service suspended
--
John Lewis
Debian & the GeneWeb genealogical data server
21 Jun
21 Jun
5:17 a.m.
New subject: users Digest, Vol 112, Issue 3
Hi Andy
Am 20.06.2018 um 09:14 schrieb john lewis
<zen57162(a)zen.co.uk>uk>:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:33:42 +0100
Steven Walker <sjb.walker(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1
Regards,
Sam
Speaking as a hobby user who never gets even
close to the limit I
would not want to occur substantial charges and have no problem with
having my service suspended. I would not quibble with having an
extra charge of a month or two. After all it can only be the
customer's fault for not monitoring the usage or reading emails.
I am in a similar position and would not have a problem having my
service suspended 
10:31 a.m.
New subject: users Digest, Vol 112, Issue 3
On 21. juni 2018 07:17, Sämi Bächler wrote:
Hi Andy
+1 - my only problem is that I'm hosting my mail at my VM, so getting
suspended would be a major inconvenience to say the least.
I should probably make sure I've registered a secondary contact-method.
But as others say, an extra month or two would be fine; a 300 times
increase however would be a problem.
- OM
Am 20.06.2018 um 09:14 schrieb john lewis
<zen57162(a)zen.co.uk>uk>:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:33:42 +0100
Steven Walker <sjb.walker(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1 Speaking as a hobby user who never gets even
close to the limit I
would not want to occur substantial charges and have no problem with
having my service suspended. I would not quibble with having an
extra charge of a month or two. After all it can only be the
customer's fault for not monitoring the usage or reading emails.
I am in a similar position and would not have a problem having my
service suspended 
11:42 a.m.
New subject: users Digest, Vol 112, Issue 3
Another hobby user here. While it would be a little inconvenient to be cut
off it would be greatly preferable to an enormous bill. I think a
user-configurable limit would be the way forward, if only because you're
likely to get a lot of variation in what people consider an acceptable
point to cut off service. Us personal users will have a different pain
threshold than someone who's got commercial interests, for example.
Regards,
Andy
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 at 11:31 Ole-Morten Duesund <olemd(a)glemt.net> wrote:
On 21. juni 2018 07:17, Sämi Bächler wrote:
Hi Andy
+1 - my only problem is that I'm hosting my mail at my VM, so getting
suspended would be a major inconvenience to say the least.
I should probably make sure I've registered a secondary contact-method.
But as others say, an extra month or two would be fine; a 300 times
increase however would be a problem.
- OM
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)lists.bitfolk.com
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users
Am 20.06.2018 um 09:14 schrieb john lewis
<zen57162(a)zen.co.uk>uk>:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:33:42 +0100
Steven Walker <sjb.walker(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1 Speaking as a hobby user who never gets even
close to the limit I
would not want to occur substantial charges and have no problem with
having my service suspended. I would not quibble with having an
extra charge of a month or two. After all it can only be the
customer's fault for not monitoring the usage or reading emails.
I am in a similar position and would not have a problem having my
service suspended 
12:08 p.m.
New subject: users Digest, Vol 112, Issue 3
I've got both what I would consider a personal VPS as well as a more
commercial VPS. For the personal VPS, I wouldn't care if it got immediately
firewalled if I hit the transfer target, but for the commercial VPS I
wouldn't want it to lose connectivity, even if it tripped into unexpected
costs (double or triple). TBH, I keep an eye on the transfer emails for
this very reason; I'd renegotiate with Andy before it got to that stage,
but I'm not one of the outliers...
Kind regards
Murray Crane
On 21 June 2018 at 12:42, andy.duffell(a)gmail.com <andy.duffell(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Another hobby user here. While it would be a little
inconvenient to be cut
off it would be greatly preferable to an enormous bill. I think a
user-configurable limit would be the way forward, if only because you're
likely to get a lot of variation in what people consider an acceptable
point to cut off service. Us personal users will have a different pain
threshold than someone who's got commercial interests, for example.
Regards,
Andy
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 at 11:31 Ole-Morten Duesund <olemd(a)glemt.net> wrote:
On 21. juni 2018 07:17, Sämi Bächler wrote:
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)lists.bitfolk.com
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi Andy
+1 - my only problem is that I'm hosting my mail at my VM, so getting
suspended would be a major inconvenience to say the least.
I should probably make sure I've registered a secondary contact-method.
But as others say, an extra month or two would be fine; a 300 times
increase however would be a problem.
- OM
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)lists.bitfolk.com
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users
Am 20.06.2018 um 09:14 schrieb john lewis
<zen57162(a)zen.co.uk>uk>:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:33:42 +0100
Steven Walker <sjb.walker(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Speaking as a hobby user who never gets even close to the limit I
> would not want to occur substantial charges and have no problem with
> having my service suspended. I would not quibble with having an
> extra charge of a month or two. After all it can only be the
> customer's fault for not monitoring the usage or reading emails.
>
I am in a similar position and would not have a problem having my
service suspended
+1 
4:33 p.m.
New subject: users Digest, Vol 112, Issue 3
On June 21, 2018 12:31 PM, Ole-Morten Duesund <olemd(a)glemt.net> wrote:
But as others say, an extra month or two would be
fine; a 300 times
increase however would be a problem.
- OM
This.
Also: would a hard cut disturb the Xen shell access? If not, a hard cut after a certain
amount of traffic and/or time without response from the customer could be an option.
Further (but still SMOP), an analysis in cases of sudden spikes could trigger automatic
blocking of specific URIs, to dam up the sudden traffic from a meme gone viral. That
should, of course, be up to the customer to sort out, but I'm sure you could offer an
out-of-the-box experience as a service for a setup or monthly fee (if you want to).
5:27 p.m.
New subject: users Digest, Vol 112, Issue 3
Hello,
Thanks for your input.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:33:24PM -0400, wowsuchnamaste via users wrote:
would a hard cut disturb the Xen shell access?
No.
Cheers,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
2129
days inactive
2131
days old
7 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
Andy Smith -
andy.duffell＠gmail.com -
john lewis -
Murray Crane -
Ole-Morten Duesund -
Steven Walker -
Sämi Bächler -
wowsuchnamaste