Re: [bitfolk] fail2ban

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M----+--\the complete thread tree sorted by date
M-+-\M+\MG. Miliotis at <-
M\M\MMMMMAndy Smith at ->

Reply to this message
Author: Dom Latter
Date:  
To: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] fail2ban
On 11/12/12 09:26, Christopher Roberts wrote:
>
> Despite having ssh listening on a non-standard port number, I noticed logwatch
> reported 103 attempts on sshd, which should not be possible if fail2ban was
> doing its job properly.

103 attempts on a non-standard port?

Anyway - do you have users that you don't trust to set a strong-enough password?


This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [bitfolk] fail2banRe: [bitfolk] Proposal: Security incidents postings->
Bitfolk Mailing List Archive administrated by List AdminLurker (version 2.3)