hat it was mostly finger-trouble, to be honest. Defo from my
part! ;-)
> If so I would really like to know.
Cool, will let you know if there is a genuine problem, at least backed
with some useful debug info.
Regards,
Jan Henkins
From matt@??? Wed Dec 05 10:52:38 2012
Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <matt@???>) id 1TgCaj-000525-Pp
for users@???; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 10:52:38 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 13so9363853iea.21
for <users@???>; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 02:52:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:x-gm-message-state;
bh=+Jy1+9xaAfStbQx9FwiBUEgJGynx/D+cLLkufHZnsrw=;
b=PwPPJ9GKRSaymVIlmOj6m8oFepMdFPr03REnABA3xSNesA5X9F1FZzncNRgPW1KCok
rnCBkzXcfr7WWI53tYl2AdhdmQIrl8oPTGWId8N67yzv/X4S1esJBvGaSaHV6FcZni+D
3dz3sig/jZWfo8jETZjGeFVPQekvM4PJPPLa5HlOxsaZIn10sRem9ITUxi++62+yVO7c
Wy2g3oRtCnLe4UNXs6vvV5JT3hQ3ceoiHS1QiS5JNCmujybWTTk0IIwqJAORGwGdz1Em
WY+aaOT11FhGms7WeBq8tigB1KknmjrYmsbVrc7XBR/pAhTB4ECeJrlETDaF1VjSTNQ7
c1cw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.5.239 with SMTP id v15mr1377411igv.41.1354704750301; Wed,
05 Dec 2012 02:52:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.41.234 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 02:52:30 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 10:52:30 +0000
Message-ID: <CALc5WvNbgxzYMOMRUSq-0pKkeuO9MHzt82qoJOpa=_1TVi37YQ@???>
From: Matthew Daubney <matt@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f502cd66ad16804d018c779
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnnkt5wZXiBUYoyRZ15JnEk1DKIQ7iOcA0xsUyr0qIRWOtT6OOWW50XszOsJ5oqwy91vieI
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
05 Dec 2012 10:52:37 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.223.176
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: matt@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at
http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust
* [209.85.223.176 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: [bitfolk] Routing issues
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received
