Hi,
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 12:00:40PM +0000, David Paul wrote:
> best I can think of at the minute is that the iptables config has been
> changed (though this is not something I've ever made changes to!)
Just to clarify, is this thread about something which you are able
to resolve when you set 8.8.8.8 as your resolver, but not when you
use the BitFolk default resolvers?
If so I would really like to know.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
From jan@??? Mon Dec 03 20:19:57 2012
Received: from [2001:ba8:1f1:f0ef:216:3eff:fe14:ae03]
(helo=heimdall.henkins.za.net)
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <jan@???>) id 1TfcUf-0004gW-1i
for users@???; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 20:19:57 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by heimdall.henkins.za.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACEB4C30F
for <users@???>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 20:19:56 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at heimdall.henkins.za.net
Received: from heimdall.henkins.za.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (heimdall.henkins.za.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024) with ESMTP id 6dXtm7CXfgQY for <users@???>;
Mon, 3 Dec 2012 20:19:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from secure.henkins.net (balder.henkins.za.net [85.119.83.94])
by heimdall.henkins.za.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6754C30E
for <users@???>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 20:19:55 +0000 (GMT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 20:19:55 +0000
From: jan@???
To: <users@???>
In-Reply-To: <20121203201045.GW19412@???>
References: <CAJ-QA9YgboSxXo+0FGQnzxejb+nU8Mqqsj3vqToUWJ4sNa+akA@???>
<a199d875c77843d230eb027ce0bc7c36@???>
<CAJ-QA9akW7Vi5pJFdxapugGVCcUgMsNNUEWwDReroe7dWabXdg@???>
<20121203201045.GW19412@???>
Message-ID: <9d2c830d0d5d7ef65e1ecafc1d5b6acf@???>
X-Sender: jan@???
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/RCMAIL_VERSION
X-bitfolk.com-Metrics-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for
2001:ba8:1f1:f0ef:216:3eff:fe14:ae03 (failed)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Mon,
03 Dec 2012 20:19:57 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:ba8:1f1:f0ef:216:3eff:fe14:ae03
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jan@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run,
due to a shortcircuited rule
* -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Can't ping pear.php.net
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 20:19:57 -0000
Hello Andy,
On 2012-12-03 20:10, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 12:00:40PM +0000, David Paul wrote:
>> best I can think of at the minute is that the iptables config has
>> been
>> changed (though this is not something I've ever made changes to!)
>
> Just to clarify, is this thread about something which you are able
> to resolve when you set 8.8.8.8 as your resolver, but not when you
> use the BitFolk default resolvers?
I think that it was mostly finger-trouble, to be honest. Defo from my
part! ;-)
> If so I would really like to know.
Cool, will let you know if there is a genuine problem, at least backed
with some useful debug info.
Regards,
Jan Henkins
From matt@??? Wed Dec 05 10:52:38 2012
Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <matt@???>) id 1TgCaj-000525-Pp
for users@???; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 10:52:38 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 13so9363853iea.21
for <users@???>; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 02:52:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:x-gm-message-state;
bh=+Jy1+9xaAfStbQx9FwiBUEgJGynx/D+cLLkufHZnsrw=;
b=PwPPJ9GKRSaymVIlmOj6m8oFepMdFPr03REnABA3xSNesA5X9F1FZzncNRgPW1KCok
rnCBkzXcfr7WWI53tYl2AdhdmQIrl8oPTGWId8N67yzv/X4S1esJBvGaSaHV6FcZni+D
3dz3sig/jZWfo8jETZjGeFVPQekvM4PJPPLa5HlOxsaZIn10sRem9ITUxi++62+yVO7c
Wy2g3oRtCnLe4UNXs6vvV5JT3hQ3ceoiHS1QiS5JNCmujybWTTk0IIwqJAORGwGdz1Em
WY+aaOT11FhGms7WeBq8tigB1KknmjrYmsbVrc7XBR/pAhTB4ECeJrlETDaF1VjSTNQ7
c1cw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.5.239 with SMTP id v15mr1377411igv.41.1354704750301; Wed,
05 Dec 2012 02:52:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.41.234 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 02:52:30 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 10:52:30 +0000
Message-ID: <CALc5WvNbgxzYMOMRUSq-0pKkeuO9MHzt82qoJOpa=_1TVi37YQ@???>
From: Matthew Daubney <matt@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f502cd66ad16804d018c779
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnnkt5wZXiBUYoyRZ15JnEk1DKIQ7iOcA0xsUyr0qIRWOtT6OOWW50XszOsJ5oqwy91vieI
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
05 Dec 2012 10:52:37 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.223.176
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: matt@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at
http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust
* [209.85.223.176 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: [bitfolk] Routing issues
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 10:52:39 -0000
--e89a8f502cd66ad16804d018c779
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Is anyone aware of any routing issues from Oz to Bitfolk? I'm doing some
remote support on a machine down there and can't ping any bitfolk ips?
-Matt Daubney
--e89a8f502cd66ad16804d018c779
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Is anyone aware of any routing issues from Oz to Bitfolk? I'm doing some remote support on a machine down there and can't ping any bitfolk ips?<div><br></div><div>-Matt Daubney</div>
--e89a8f502cd66ad16804d018c779--
From michael@??? Wed Dec 05 11:19:29 2012
Received: from buzz.pasdex.com ([85.119.82.104])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <michael@???>) id 1TgD0j-0006VN-SX
for users@???; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:19:29 +0000
Received: from www.pasdex.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
(Authenticated sender: michael)
by buzz.pasdex.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E90EA5BCD3;
Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:19:28 +0000 (GMT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=pasdex.com; c=nofws; q=dns;
b=ebIu7hMOXNLL8MVwvrWcE/7Hy4EWqts3M7xQ3vHnwOqqCIrgVSm30LX5evPxEwaga
U8Fts0uGW90qFoQs+ykebEbyMdCpd8ueCGN60ualmK7xC/OJeEis1kFSsQoyVEY7Dyo
ARbYAVOOSPe8n0zoAXNSmFzn/g3cAqOJt9aaVxM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pasdex.com; s=mail;
t=1354706369; bh=IC8ozGDlSbgZ/wjyUQy4eLTPvMz12VtcPCjWHGg4/nU=;
h=Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To;
b=DxnjWMPBPObF9KpEmToxmCnNj64jE8WQGnGuzKOIef/1Lc97zA4iBf8L55lonAeDU
cVjUkztRGnX1B85V7Kd1wCiPf0wJIGqgrhSboEux/r2yq2rZF+9KtT8K+DNsNCm5nV
0SvcgcH4AAcmtnWZ7+cXiolW5A/oDG7nQs2a3VWA=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Michael Watkin <michael@???>
In-Reply-To: <CALc5WvNbgxzYMOMRUSq-0pKkeuO9MHzt82qoJOpa=_1TVi37YQ@???>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:19:28 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <65D0C393-742B-4E3B-A817-8D0511A52F87@???>
References: <CALc5WvNbgxzYMOMRUSq-0pKkeuO9MHzt82qoJOpa=_1TVi37YQ@???>
To: Matthew Daubney <matt@???>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
05 Dec 2012 11:19:29 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.82.104
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: michael@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: users@???
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Routing issues
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:19:30 -0000
I raised this with Andy as IPs in the 1.125.0.0/16 range (which has been
