g@???>
<b533c618ea3741c2eaf9b484896ee58b@???>
<CAEgwzvLPoMzMGmEvWs2OzZg7g=f4r1nDohY6=b34SEuaa6BbCQ@???>
Message-ID: <9e11b79120e132c7731775fd2fb32d22@???>
X-Sender: jan@???
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/RCMAIL_VERSION
X-bitfolk.com-Metrics-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for
2001:ba8:1f1:f0ef:216:3eff:fe14:ae03 (failed)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Mon,
03 Dec 2012 14:00:54 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:ba8:1f1:f0ef:216:3eff:fe14:ae03
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jan@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run,
due to a shortcircuited rule
* -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Cc: Bitfolk Users <users@???>,
David Paul <jedi58@???>
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Can't ping pear.php.net
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:00:54 -0000
On 2012-12-03 12:36, Neil McKillop wrote:
> Note, you seem to have typo'd the bitfolk IP addresses.
>
> Neil.
<blush> Whups! So I did! :-/
So in that case it's a good job to know that the proper ones does
indeed work! :-P
From andy@??? Mon Dec 03 20:10:46 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1TfcLl-0003lH-Od
for users@???; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 20:10:45 +0000
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 20:10:45 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20121203201045.GW19412@???>
References: <CAJ-QA9YgboSxXo+0FGQnzxejb+nU8Mqqsj3vqToUWJ4sNa+akA@???>
<a199d875c77843d230eb027ce0bc7c36@???>
<CAJ-QA9akW7Vi5pJFdxapugGVCcUgMsNNUEWwDReroe7dWabXdg@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-QA9akW7Vi5pJFdxapugGVCcUgMsNNUEWwDReroe7dWabXdg@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Mon,
03 Dec 2012 20:10:45 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Can't ping pear.php.net
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 20:10:46 -0000
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 12:00:40PM +0000, David Paul wrote:
> best I can think of at the minute is that the iptables config has been
> changed (though this is not something I've ever made changes to!)
Just to clarify, is this thread about something which you are able
to resolve when you set 8.8.8.8 as your resolver, but not when you
use the BitFolk default resolvers?
If so I would really like to know.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
From jan@??? Mon Dec 03 20:19:57 2012
Received: from [2001:ba8:1f1:f0ef:216:3eff:fe14:ae03]
(helo=heimdall.henkins.za.net)
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <jan@???>) id 1TfcUf-0004gW-1i
fo
