Re: [bitfolk] Finding out old IP users

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: S P
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Finding out old IP users
om>) id 1SXx8Y-00044E-CS
    for users@???; Fri, 25 May 2012 16:13:10 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
    by numpty.absolutelyplastered.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2404064AB4
    for <users@???>; Fri, 25 May 2012 16:13:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at numpty.absolutelyplastered.com
Received: from numpty.absolutelyplastered.com ([127.0.0.1])
    by localhost (numpty.absolutelyplastered.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
    port 10024) with ESMTP id Ixdu9ubAmVgt for <users@???>;
    Fri, 25 May 2012 16:13:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ultra.lanky.localnet (unknown [80.70.54.7])
    (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
    (Client did not present a certificate)
    by numpty.absolutelyplastered.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7385564A03
    for <users@???>; Fri, 25 May 2012 16:13:03 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4FBFAF8F.402@???>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 17:13:03 +0100
From: Stuart Sears <stuart@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
    rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <422c862e-34bb-4a3a-adf7-a1c672ad2183@???>
    <4FBF8F27.8080702@???> <4FBFAC65.1090209@???>
In-Reply-To: <4FBFAC65.1090209@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
    25 May 2012 16:13:10 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.82.19
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: stuart@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] My first time running mail and DNS
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:13:10 -0000


On 25/05/12 16:59, Ian wrote:
> Stuart said:
>
>> postfix for SMTP
>> [along with amavisd + clamav + postgrey + spamassassin]
>
> My experience is that postgrey makes spamassassin unnecessary. I will
> also confess to not using a scanner on the server.


I don't find that, but then I manage email for other people (family
mostly) who use windows desktops and are fairly clueless about what they
send/forward or who they hand email addresses out to.

I feel better about viruses being caught before delivery(so far 100%
success rate on that. I think. No one has noticed otherwise.)

spamassassin helps, too. Spammers are getting better at using proper
smtp servers that retry on soft rejects, so postgrey itself is not
sufficient alone, IME.

Although I am probably preventing all those Nigerian philanthropists
from handing out all their money. :)

Regards,

Stuart
--
Stuart Sears RHCA etc.
"It's today!" said Piglet.
"My favourite day," said Pooh.


From andyjpb@??? Fri May 25 17:07:34 2012
Received: from pavilion.ashurst.eu.org ([85.119.82.45])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <andyjpb@???>)
    id 1SXxzC-0006X0-HK
    for users@???; Fri, 25 May 2012 17:07:34 +0000
Received: from [74.125.57.186] (helo=[192.168.147.133])
    by pavilion.ashurst.eu.org with esmtpsa
    (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <andyjpb@???>)
    id 1SXxzA-00064Y-NH; Fri, 25 May 2012 18:07:32 +0100
Message-ID: <4FBFBC54.5090105@???>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 18:07:32 +0100
From: Andy Bennett <andyjpb@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
    rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120510 Icedove/10.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Stimpson <paul@???>
References: <422c862e-34bb-4a3a-adf7-a1c672ad2183@???>
In-Reply-To: <422c862e-34bb-4a3a-adf7-a1c672ad2183@???>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
    shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run,
    due to a shortcircuited rule
    * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
    25 May 2012 17:07:34 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.82.45
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andyjpb@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: users@???
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] My first time running mail and DNS
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 17:07:35 -0000


Hi,

> Thank you for you help with choosing a domain registrar. I went with
> Gandi I'm the end and they seem great.
>
> I've bought my first domains and I'm just about to begin configuring
> services on my VPS. This is the first time I've run a server facing the
> public internet.


Good work! It's great that you're jumping in the deep end.


> I'd really