Stuart said:
> postfix for SMTP
> [along with amavisd + clamav + postgrey + spamassassin]
My experience is that postgrey makes spamassassin unnecessary. I will
also confess to not using a scanner on the server.
Ian
From stuart@??? Fri May 25 16:13:10 2012
Received: from numpty.absolutelyplastered.com ([85.119.82.19])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <stuart@???>) id 1SXx8Y-00044E-CS
for users@???; Fri, 25 May 2012 16:13:10 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by numpty.absolutelyplastered.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2404064AB4
for <users@???>; Fri, 25 May 2012 16:13:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at numpty.absolutelyplastered.com
Received: from numpty.absolutelyplastered.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (numpty.absolutelyplastered.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024) with ESMTP id Ixdu9ubAmVgt for <users@???>;
Fri, 25 May 2012 16:13:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ultra.lanky.localnet (unknown [80.70.54.7])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by numpty.absolutelyplastered.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7385564A03
for <users@???>; Fri, 25 May 2012 16:13:03 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4FBFAF8F.402@???>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 17:13:03 +0100
From: Stuart Sears <stuart@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <422c862e-34bb-4a3a-adf7-a1c672ad2183@???>
<4FBF8F27.8080702@???> <4FBFAC65.1090209@???>
In-Reply-To: <4FBFAC65.1090209@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
25 May 2012 16:13:10 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.82.19
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: stuart@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com);
