ender matches SPF record
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
* -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust
* [209.85.214.176 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] sending (and potentially receiving) email from my VPS
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 07:10:09 -0000
On 25 May 2012 06:57, Ross Younger <ross@???> wrote:
> On 25/05/12 16:37, Philip Hunt wrote:
>>
>> Does Bitfolk have an SMTP server that I could use for this? Or should
>> I use Google SMTP server?
>
>
> Is there some reason you don't want your VPS to act as a full first-class
> internet mail system?
Not really, other than it might be a hassle to set up.
> I was under the impression that that was what most
> customers did.
If that's the favoured way of doing it, then I'm happy to do it that
way, I suppose.
--
Phil Hunt, <cabalamat@???>
From ewan@??? Fri May 25 07:57:40 2012
Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com ([209.85.214.176])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ewan@???>)
id 1SXpP2-0005IC-1s
for users@???; Fri, 25 May 2012 07:57:40 +0000
Received: by obbef5 with SMTP id ef5so1326047obb.21
for <users@???>; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=nutmegdata.co.uk; s=google;
h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=mROOnC5Rn6APfRnbzkoNeunabkHyrlRrh2DF726klx8=;
b=Z0C6Ris/k5VdCAr/ExeagTFW/ehTSNTbEgy8vXmK5OEsKb1UxZ9VK4SY1jijwrp/S2
pqr+iuV4RcAxeswyhWVgYXYv+m2/811mcT/8P+Yo8v99GDsDOc8YrHKJwIH25ItrVtC9
86lFMEVku5+Mw+tHqSJbtpZNE/omzjBpZJZ1o=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
bh=mROOnC5Rn6APfRnbzkoNeunabkHyrlRrh2DF726klx8=;
b=gGjP1jh+aAMUlNZj6AyMirjz3u0/W042CGEtcEnzPIiFKZt9lcV2kKc4BIJCQmwTUs
G1t150ifbuJRs42eKr37Uu85I1pz650vZYGs06bInaN5nz0vk+SeNxROgBiMX/BuIXZZ
YKreEP8jHjCo2nnpSWdAnxvVPq0R/rdQAqjC3NgcbHHx6OHPWX3JARPutfsZ1oeJXN53
i3lmRC0tIXNEt+0PKIWD2xloJz9Lf7DBH9gToBwoQ4+84dcuXErT5TPxJcQhgdCrDlVl
BlJDdFksMnOxMa7tns6Im9EMxJheTc3PzumMHS8j6MhfWDcmKML6g2AviwMbWx9aTLXe
g1eg==
Received: by 10.182.8.99 with SMTP id q3mr2178484oba.63.1337932653009; Fri, 25
May 2012 00:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.34.68 with HTTP; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [62.24.245.197]
In-Reply-To: <CANrmF70r4nKgcw4q0-ZgJ69ChJPQ4eV38OAFywXWKG5V-D3Nbg@???>
References: <CANrmF72B+RJtPBtcJGyLXr7H5Fd8TwtxCoqHrQ_J+pydOK6Kpg@???>
<4FBF1F49.4050906@???>
<CANrmF70r4nKgcw4q0-ZgJ69ChJPQ4eV38OAFywXWKG5V-D3Nbg@???>
From: Ewan Leith <ewan@???>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 08:57:12 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOOtku_ZhmPB_A7=p_1UGoujmJu3m01FFjyH+xAQQYn0VuUzfQ@???>
To: Philip Hunt <cabalamat@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8
