On Fri, May 25, 2012, at 02:43 PM, Paul Stimpson wrote:
> I'd really appreciate any guidance on the best way to set up the
> following so that it's competent, reliable and doesn't get pwned. I
> want to be a good net citizen.
>
> *BIND
Leaving the rest to people who run mail servers more often than me, do
you actually *need* bind? I've never had an issue with gandi's
nameservers.
--
Richard Dignall
richard@???
www.bebackedup.co.uk
From simon@??? Fri May 25 14:29:19 2012
Received: from mail.calmblue.net ([92.243.6.179])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <simon@???>) id 1SXvW3-0007Qw-AY
for users@???; Fri, 25 May 2012 14:29:19 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.20] (mail.kitab.org.uk [81.187.17.242])
by mail.calmblue.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2DF3E97
for <users@???>; Fri, 25 May 2012 15:56:40 +0200 (CEST)
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.0.4 mail.calmblue.net 0F2DF3E97
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=calmblue.net;
s=default; t=1337954200;
bh=SYUf8X4r912jfEJ3pS6sDI5RJrRBL+4GvPouXreVePM=;
h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:
In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
b=oDnVDKza7+C29/mDunN4XRxWpHfoOVzU+mNtFigWffSe9weLJKkUx1wGqa3gZEfwC
iBfnVeWGNcDovnkkTP+WSp3c8msryyf68xJEjjm3b7O+nWTZJzz1Tjx6Js4bL8SvYA
k2SxtULDewlLAwFePkglAHPS3AQUTwsRES+HNeks=
Message-ID: <4FBF8F87.5090905@???>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 14:56:23 +0100
From: Simon Bell <simon@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <422c862e-34bb-4a3a-adf7-a1c672ad2183@???>
In-Reply-To: <422c862e-34bb-4a3a-adf7-a1c672ad2183@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
25 May 2012 14:29:19 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 92.243.6.179
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: simon@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS29169 92.243.0.0/19
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
* -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
* domain * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_
