TP server that I could use for this? Or should
> I use Google SMTP server?
Is there some reason you don't want your VPS to act as a full
first-class internet mail system? I was under the impression that that
was what most customers did.
Ross
From cabalamat@??? Fri May 25 07:10:09 2012
Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com ([209.85.214.176])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cabalamat@???>) id 1SXof2-0003T0-GI
for users@???; Fri, 25 May 2012 07:10:09 +0000
Received: by obbef5 with SMTP id ef5so1247369obb.21
for <users@???>; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=SV5d7Se34WsRiDo4IUY4Z2zD+b2f3V+2Wl1AzW2Dmx8=;
b=XSVsVWJHxrE9TvANRbu0PUv5fdo4oDEftiqAcq3yWXELLgtS1bP7lk+MTj8wyWfPqO
L5yyQ7+oYPgwuf9zWoihUguYJwIx31kkXcoVkUurMt+tMVy1Ii0zig8TuUCao+ICPBBZ
30faf/KZj//ARctten4v3mZlGtACvqmoy60XI+Wr7RW1hTmUGQ/+8VMeGtkSsTGOyOlR
CUXQMfRIp33r9hWQx7nsCODq31SH6VNepkEulZqWIKjfDPN0hGlvs1LM5O3EOclKc6Rn
zyLabtuTob19F0y4wqyiqDojXma4G/ZmrmXGkY8EtgWRk2pai8sujjdCddqDGZM4yrD5
ts6g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.14.193 with SMTP id r1mr2214039oec.16.1337929801770; Fri,
25 May 2012 00:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.70.168 with HTTP; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FBF1F49.4050906@???>
References: <CANrmF72B+RJtPBtcJGyLXr7H5Fd8TwtxCoqHrQ_J+pydOK6Kpg@???>
<4FBF1F49.4050906@???>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 08:10:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CANrmF70r4nKgcw4q0-ZgJ69ChJPQ4eV38OAFywXWKG5V-D3Nbg@???>
From: Philip Hunt <cabalamat@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
25 May 2012 07:10:08 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.214.176
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: cabalamat@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
* -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust
* [209.85.214.176 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] sending (and potentially receiving) email from my VPS
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 07:10:09 -0000
On 25 May 2012 06:57, Ross Younger <ross@???> wrote:
> On 25/05/12 16:37, Philip Hunt wrote:
>>
>> Does Bitfolk have an SMTP server that I could use for this? Or should
>> I use Google SMTP server?
>
>
> Is there some reason you don't want your VPS to act as a full first-class
> internet mail system?
Not really, other than it might be a hassle to set up.
> I was under the impression that that was what most
> customers did.
If that's the favoured way of doing it, then I'm happy to do it that
way, I suppose.
--
Phil Hunt, <cabalamat@???>
From ewan@??? Fri May 25 07:57:40 2012
Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com ([209.85.214.176])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ewan@???>)
id 1SXpP2-0005IC-1s
for users@???; Fri, 25 May 2012 07:57:40 +0000
Received: by obbef5 with SMTP id ef5so1326047obb.21
for <users@???>; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=nutmegdata.co.uk; s=google;
h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:
