Re: [bitfolk] does bitfolk block smtp from t-mobile ip addre…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Joseph Heenan
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] does bitfolk block smtp from t-mobile ip addresses?
But=E2=80=A6

> Normally I don't ask suppliers, because bitcoin isn't big enough yet that=

I=20
> think I'll get a sensible answer from them; but Bitfolk has always struck=

me=20
> as being ahead of the technological curve.


=E2=80=A6unfortunately BitFolk's accountant doesn't really know how to make
sense of it. The concept of virtual currencies strikes fear ,
uncertainty and doubt into their hearts, not joy. I don't really
want to push them over it at the moment.

There has been a feature request for this for some time (but it was
created by me!):

    https://tools.bitfolk.com/redmine/issues/63


Please do log in and vote it up if you are interested in it. I will
try to revisit the subject with my accountants if interest is shown.

Cheers,
Andy

--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

--wmhq21yAGFMoSpeN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAk91hoYACgkQIJm2TL8VSQv8gQCgtwGuQw8zPE59gzowsQp9v51c
+nwAnRiSkGPvyDKyGjQ8ilfHxb7c6lja
=Bg23
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wmhq21yAGFMoSpeN--


From andyparkins@??? Fri Mar 30 10:53:44 2012
Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <andyparkins@???>)
    id 1SDZSh-0007zh-Mf
    for users@???; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:53:44 +0000
Received: by wgbgn7 with SMTP id gn7so419228wgb.21
    for <users@???>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
    h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
    :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
    bh=8VjjNTmJWhReCn3r9x9D3RUUTAylpNCl85kHzCT92mo=;
    b=rrAOkPnqDE+NPmQSfmU53FaodiVDababceKhwA9OUIyZoqP7Vr1AToGlOw51/e1JKb
    rgm2QM1FRklRpD10m8UdUZS4xsZJbfHVoovm7aG2H9wf55u5mB7jrUTCEWNWwnvYvaDw
    tO6+sP3WUW+6BqPltRJPDR5+JDs3KX7Wvrqcr6zc37j7yr7xb8tPLrxqAF1YXucjgCLf
    Yvz9Nx+oxp4XW8b5jPbXO1ZOeF19anuIIoHpCBuinrHwBiRiAttPT/OziO/bR7XdHXzo
    fzuVX9hTVJAUiwUxmC8ghaNX1dS5Y19rF7vhz9E800nyHTGtpLPcXyj5EMirc5eejA3b
    JCnA==
Received: by 10.180.85.69 with SMTP id f5mr5219228wiz.18.1333104817622;
    Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dvr.localnet (mail.360visiontec