Jon asked:
> Has it prompted your for the IP of the nameserver? If not then maybe
> it's an issue with the 123-Reg Control Panel?
Yes, and I keep telling it the correct one!
> Quote from 123-Reg control panel (in my case using bitfolk as secondaries)
> When entering the IP address for a nameserver within example1.co.uk, you
> will need to use an IP address which has not been used as a nameserver
> for a different domain. You cannot use the same IP for different
> nameservers.
This is the paragraph I do not believe, because it has never been an
issue with any of the domains I have registered with them.
> Alternatively, there might be workarounds e.g. listing a slightly
> different dns name in the short-term e.g. sub1 or top1 in both DNS and
> delegation and changing it back a bit later.
This is what I am going to try next.
Ian
From bitfolklist@??? Sat Feb 11 12:30:38 2012
Received: from [2001:ba8:1f1:f137::2] (helo=secure.newtonnet.co.uk)
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <bitfolklist@???>) id 1RwC69-0003Ls-Oz
for users@???; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:30:38 +0000
Received: by secure.newtonnet.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 108)
id E109AA0188; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:30:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from secure.newtonnet.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by secure.newtonnet.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BAFA0183
for <users@???>; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:30:35 +0000 (GMT)
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.6.0 secure.newtonnet.co.uk E3BAFA0183
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=newtonnet.co.uk;
s=2011; t=1328963435; bh=tiilfmNezcun8FfJJVv4Kl6J6OzKA5n+KjgsxvVBHf
I=; h=Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To:
MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=iTPDZaO78Ys
TDkeEgUasbELTVm9HLFOoJIvDYmeviAeloxDLOo9Nc0qvy+qpH+GRBq9BRWxcKUqbcq
kjVtc1Mg584I0hk4PJYwVb0gqlmE3UQR8haLemb4hrRmuJ1zruBnkDGEp64ofnA30Uz
UHlgCkR69wWGczgTVtyTCPNdbo=
Received: from 2a02:16c8:2000:600:14cd:b428:2651:5768
(SquirrelMail authenticated user mathew)
by secure.newtonnet.co.uk with HTTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:30:35 -0000
Message-ID: <85f2071f1be555fe6f6a47eb6bafbb58.squirrel@???>
In-Reply-To: <4F364EB3.3000604@???>
References: <4F352183.4070708@???>
<2AEAD09C-4403-484D-95BB-D0B313FC5DCD@???>
<4F354B64.7040405@???> <4F35596E.3000906@???>
<4F364EB3.3000604@???>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:30:35 -0000
From: "Mathew Newton" <bitfolklist@???>
To: users@???
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-bitfolk.com-Metrics-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for
2001:ba8:1f1:f137::2 (failed)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sat,
11 Feb 2012 12:30:37 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:ba8:1f1:f137::2
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bitfolklist@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule
* -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] IP address at Nominet's nameservers is wrong
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-re
