Re: [bitfolk] World IPv6 Day - What have you done with IPv6?

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Hugo Mills
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] World IPv6 Day - What have you done with IPv6?
ist
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:04:43 -0000



--ikqct/fZAlyRpWN7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Keith,

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 06:34:33PM +0000, Keith Williams wrote:
> I got a warning email saying that c.authns.bitfolk.com was suffering s
> critical error, then very soon afterwards an email saying it was recovere=

d.

Sorry about that. I made a mistake and corrected it about a minute
later. It was enough for some people to get some alerts.

> I did a quick check with intodns.com and all was well except this
>=20
> Same GlueLooks like the A records (the GLUE) got from the parent zone
> check are different than the ones got from your nameservers. You have to
> make sure your parent server has the same NS records for your zone as you
> do.I detected some problems as follows:
> For *c.authns.bitfolk.com* the parent reported: *['209.237.247.198']* and
> your nameservers reported: *['173.255.227.192']*


I'm just writing an email about this but basically there's nothing
to worry about. c.authns.bitfolk.com has been renumbered and for a
short time, the root nameservers may have the old IP address (which
still works anyway).

> Everytime I refresh it reports slightly differently with server c always
> reported as wrong sometimes all three


=2E.but I can't see how or why all three should be reported that way
as nothing has changed with the other two.

I always tend to use http://squish.net :

    http://dns.squish.net/traverses/086a4b6aaef7e9dddfecbb55fbec489e/detail


and that seems happy.

--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

--ikqct/fZAlyRpWN7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAk81akoACgkQIJm2TL8VSQt56gCeKzoK6IhtKTfVICCw8arwOMGZ
GY4AoLxnExWpq+SKwLqc9yGDcv7ca1km
=p1eb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ikqct/fZAlyRpWN7--


From phil@??? Fri Feb 10 19:05:48 2012
Received: from crazy.spenced.com ([85.119.82.182] ident=qmailr)
    by mail.bitfolk.com with smtp (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <phil@???>) id 1Rvvn2-0003V8-Mx
    for users@???; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:05:48 +0000
Received: (qmail 28760 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2012 19:05:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.30.201?) (32.115.106.34)
    by king.philtopia.com with SMTP; 10 Feb 2012 19:05:46 -0000
From: Phil Spencer <phil@???>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    boundary="Apple-Mail=_ABB70500-8D0D-45BE-88FC-1A0A4C707F95"
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:05:40 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4F3569B5.7050405@???>
To: users <users@???>
References: <CAMe3QpNkapO8GdRjBEBDibvP4x6wmEJsUgRoYDxwZO75icwGGA@???>
    <4F3569B5.7050405@???>
Message-Id: <E87949CB-8878-43BC-A668-B720B855301F@???>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
    10 Feb 2012 19:05:48 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.82.182
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: phil@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] DNS hiccups
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:05:48 -0000



--Apple-Mail=_ABB70500-8D0D-45BE-88FC-1A0A4C707F95
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset=iso-8859-1


We've been renumbered again!!! panic!!!!!!!

On Feb 10, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Gavin Westwood wrote:

> On 10/02/2012 18:34, Keith Williams wrote:
>>=20
>> I got a warning email saying that c.authns.bitfolk.com was suffering =

s critical error, then very soon afterwards an email saying it was =
recovered.
>> <snip>
>> I assume there is some work going on with the servers as my domain is =

resolving
>=20
> I had similar warnings and I guess others have too...
>=20
> Gavin
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@???
> https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users



--Apple-Mail=_ABB70500-8D0D-45BE-88FC-1A0A4C707F95
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/html;
    charset=iso-8859-1


<html><head></head><body sty