Re: [bitfolk] World IPv6 Day - What have you done with IPv6?

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Progga
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] World IPv6 Day - What have you done with IPv6?
_______________________________________________<br>users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com">users@???</a><br>https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users<br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>
--Apple-Mail=_ABB70500-8D0D-45BE-88FC-1A0A4C707F95--


From announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@??? Fri Feb 10 19:18:43 2012
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bitfolk.com)
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from
    <announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???>)
    id 1RvvzX-0004Z3-3k
    for users@???; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:18:43 +0000
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1RvvzQ-0004Xx-Hz
    for announce@???; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:18:37 +0000
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:18:36 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: announce@???
Message-ID: <20120210191836.GB23380@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
    10 Feb 2012 19:18:36 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
    autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-BeenThere: announce@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1744513902=="
Sender: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
Errors-To: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
    10 Feb 2012 19:18:43 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: [bitfolk] c.authns.bitfolk.com has been renumbered
X-BeenThere: users@???
Reply-To: users@???
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:18:43 -0000



--===============1744513902==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
    protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="j1TzbQBGf+ftliiX"
Content-Disposition: inline



--j1TzbQBGf+ftliiX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

If you don't make use of BitFolk's secondary DNS service then you
can ignore this email as it has no impact on you.

c.authns.bitfolk.com has been renumbered:

    209.20.91.73       =E2=86=92 173.255.227.192
    2001:4978:f:392::2 =E2=86=92 2600:3c03::31:2053


This actually has nothing to do with BitFolk's renumbering.
c.authns used to be hosted at Slicehost which recently got bought
by Rackspace, and they are also renumbering.

Most people don't need to do anything. The glue record for
c.authns.bitfolk.com has been updated so over the next couple of
days the new IP will start being used.

If you have made your own DNS records that pointed at 209.20.91.73
or 2001:4978:f:392::2 (for example if you made nameserver host
names inside your own domain(s)) then you will need to update them.
It is recommended not to use such names because of the need to
change them in so many places.

You may also have ACLs that allow zone transfer from 209.20.91.73.
These normally don't get used since the BitFolk nameservers try to do
zone transfer from each other first. If you do have such an ACL then
you will need to update it.

209.20.91.73 and 2001:4978:f:392::2 will go away on 19th March.

Cheers,
Andy

--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

--j1TzbQBGf+ftliiX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)