<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 10/02/2012 18:34, Keith Williams wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAMe3QpNkapO8GdRjBEBDibvP4x6wmEJsUgRoYDxwZO75icwGGA@???"
type="cite">
<div>I got a warning email saying that <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://c.authns.bitfolk.com">c.authns.bitfolk.com</a>
was suffering s critical error, then very soon afterwards an
email saying it was recovered.<br>
<snip><br>
I assume there is some work going on with the servers as my
domain is resolving<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I had similar warnings and I guess others have too...<br>
<br>
Gavin<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------080909030701070404020004--
From andy@??? Fri Feb 10 19:04:43 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1Rvvly-0003K2-Vk
for users@???; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:04:43 +0000
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:04:42 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120210190442.GA23380@???>
References: <CAMe3QpNkapO8GdRjBEBDibvP4x6wmEJsUgRoYDxwZO75icwGGA@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikqct/fZAlyRpWN7"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMe3QpNkapO8GdRjBEBDibvP4x6wmEJsUgRoYDxwZO75icwGGA@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
10 Feb 2012 19:04:43 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] DNS hiccups
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:04:43 -0000
--ikqct/fZAlyRpWN7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Keith,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 06:34:33PM +0000, Keith Williams wrote:
> I got a warning email saying that c.authns.bitfolk.com was suffering s
> critical error, then very soon afterwards an email saying it was recovere=
d.
Sorry about that. I made a mistake and corrected it about a minute
later. It was enough for some people to get some alerts.
> I did a quick check with intodns.com and all was well except this
>=20
> Same GlueLooks like the A records (the GLUE) got from the parent zone
> check are different than the ones got from your nameservers. You have to
> make sure your parent server has the same NS records for your zone as you
> do.I detected some problems as follows:
> For *c.authns.bitfolk.com* the parent reported: *['209.237.247.198']* and
> your nameservers reported: *['173.255.227.192']*
I'm just writing an email about this but basically there's nothing
to worry about. c.authns.bitfolk.com has been renumbered and for a
short time, the root nameservers may have the old IP address (which
still works anyway).
> Everytime I refresh it reports slightly differently with server c always
> reported as wrong sometimes all three
=2E.but I can't see how or why all three should be reported that way
as nothing has changed with the other two.
I always tend to use
http://squish.net :
http://dns.squish.net/traverses/086a4b6aaef7e9dddfecbb55fbec489e/detail
and that seems happy.
--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
--ikqct/fZAlyRpWN7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAk81akoACgkQIJm2TL8VSQt56gCeKzoK6IhtKTfVICCw8arwOMGZ
GY4AoLxnExWpq+SKwLqc9yGDcv7ca1km
=p1eb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ikqct/fZAlyRpWN7--
From phil@??? Fri Feb 10 19:05:48 2012
Received: from crazy.spenced.com ([85.119.82.182] ident=qmailr)
by mail.bitfolk.com with smtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <phil@???>) id 1Rvvn2-0003V8-Mx
for users@???; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:05:48 +0000
Received: (qmail 28760 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2012 19:05:46 -0
