AYFAk8btaUACgkQIJm2TL8VSQvxNACdExoQe4LqarUH5aNEt576O96i
zR8AoKK6kM7hdWvRUllqBO/5wHQ3Seg6
=bwNk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--VmyrZ50r30oK77nV--
From michaeljcorliss@??? Sun Jan 22 08:04:38 2012
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <michaeljcorliss@???>)
id 1RosPl-0008Ll-H1
for users@???; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:04:38 +0000
Received: by lahl5 with SMTP id l5so1620261lah.21
for <users@???>; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:04:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=AoZOps0mbSPT4krYJKgG/g967AdE4afE5bZUnsu+J6s=;
b=x6K20x0x/3bgPCdYLJfXBFhn+aIdatigiQkNpQzHOUyPADuNnZoU9R7CPOF4bpCjLH
Uv36fXp9UlM+MZSE6DXWsznRr/b96fNSOE5TsYfAP7GOTKmIMXZ6NJkkQncVsmH2I3CQ
izvFCEh9Uulk+MY0EtTr1HLpOyUdQ5QtwFMQU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.114.169 with SMTP id jh9mr1982983lab.20.1327219471206;
Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:04:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.91.175 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:04:31 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:04:31 -0600
Message-ID: <CACGFHYC0Zh-LdGWxXHJ+UXprLF3OeWoduGwGRr3q0RtgRuwDtw@???>
From: Michael Corliss <michaeljcorliss@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04083a631ec9da04b7195dd1
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sun,
22 Jan 2012 08:04:37 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.215.48
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: michaeljcorliss@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust * [209.85.215.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: [bitfolk] Renumbering IPs and Bind
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:04:38 -0000
--f46d04083a631ec9da04b7195dd1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I renumbered my Ubuntu VPS at the end of december, I had thought
successfully, until this we
