com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust * [209.85.215.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: [bitfolk] Renumbering IPs and Bind
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:04:38 -0000
--f46d04083a631ec9da04b7195dd1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I renumbered my Ubuntu VPS at the end of december, I had thought
successfully, until this week I got an email letting me know that my
website was still using the old IP address. I didn't disable the old
address, but I did add the new one and change the address in the bind zone
file. I updated the serial number in the file, which I thought was
sufficient to send the file up the chain (pardon, my understanding of
what's really happening in this step is sketchy), but nslookup confirms
that the site is still using the old IP address. Is there something I'm
missing to get the Bitfolk nameservers to take the updated file?
Thank you,
Mike
--f46d04083a631ec9da04b7195dd1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I renumbered my Ubuntu VPS at the end of december, I had thought successful=
ly, until this week I got an email letting me know that my website was stil=
l using the old IP address. =A0I didn't disable the old address, but I =
did add the new one and change the address in the bind zone file. =A0I upda=
ted the serial number in the file, which I thought was sufficient to send t=
he file up the chain (pardon, my understanding of what's really happeni=
ng in this step is sketchy), but nslookup confirms that the site is still u=
sing the old IP address. =A0Is there something I'm missing to get the B=
itfolk nameservers to take the updated file? =A0<div>
<br></div><div>Thank you,</div><div>Mike</div>
--f46d04083a631ec9da04b7195dd1--
From andy@??? Sun Jan 22 08:09:25 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1RosUP-00009Q-2c
for users@???; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:09:25 +0000
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:09:25 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120122080925.GV23380@???>
References: <CACGFHYC0Zh-LdGWxXHJ+UXprLF3OeWoduGwGRr3q0RtgRuwDtw@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="96icqjDFsSi85SgI"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACGFHYC0Zh-LdGWxXHJ+UXprLF3OeWoduGwGRr3q0RtgRuwDtw@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sun,
22 Jan 2012 08:09:25 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_REL
