signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAk8X7iwACgkQIJm2TL8VSQsfVgCgmsPSxS0f9agwn1JC9mDb1tqb
u44An1gLLgDmvpTauBWb5Z42QkRQu+yV
=ScnY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--9ToWwKEyhugL+MAz--
--===============0780712468==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce@???
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/announce
--===============0780712468==--
From andy@??? Sun Jan 22 07:07:17 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1RorWH-0006dN-CQ
for users@???; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 07:07:17 +0000
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 07:07:17 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120122070717.GU23380@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VmyrZ50r30oK77nV"
Content-Disposition: inline
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sun,
22 Jan 2012 07:07:17 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: [bitfolk] RAM requirements for CentOS 6.x / Scientific Linux 6.x
install
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 07:07:18 -0000
--VmyrZ50r30oK77nV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
It appears that recently, CentOS 6.x and Scientific Linux 6.x
installers started to require 512MiB RAM. Our smallest and most
popular VPS plan currently has 480MiB RAM. That means that the
average=B9 BitFolk customer now cannot self-install derivatives of
RHEL 6.x.
This is extremely annoying since I suspect that these distributions
work just the same in 480MiB RAM now as they did a few months ago.
I can't find a simple way to override that check (please let me know
if you know of one), and I'm not quite ready to increase the default
RAM allocation to 512MiB.
In the short term I am tempted t
