6 Feb
2012
6 Feb
'12
10:40 a.m.
** Andy Smith <andy(a)bitfolk.com> [2012-02-06 01:04]:
** end quote [Andy Smith]
Yes, I've done that now, although I did wait unti this morning just to be sure
my brain was functioning properly. There are some things you relly don't want
to make a mess of because you're not quite on top form! That's the joy of
mailing lists, a moments typing with cotton wool for brains can be immortalised
for all to see :)
--
Paul Tansom | Aptanet Ltd. | http://www.aptanet.com/ | 023 9238 0001
======================================================================
Registered in England | Company No: 4905028 | Registered Office:
Crawford House, Hambledon Road, Denmead, Waterlooville, Hants, PO7 6NU
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 08:35:49PM +0000, Paul Tansom
wrote:
> ** Paul Tansom <paul(a)aptanet.com> [2012-02-05 20:27]:
<snikp>
I note your
default gateway is 85.119.80.1, whereas mine is set to 85.119.82.1.
That said, the documentation quotes the one you are using, so arguably mine
shouldn't work, but it does!!
It will work, but will end up doing strange things if the customer
at 85.119.82.1 ever ends up on the same node as you. You should
probably fix it if you don't want them to receive some of your
traffic.