Re: [bitfolk] apt-cacher errors

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:04:36AM +0000, Andy Smith wrote: On my client, $ sha1sum /var/lib/apt/lists/apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com_debian_security.debian.org_dists_squeeze_updates_Release* b17b00701562018efbcd4c2d37c2b5cc017c9464 /var/lib/apt/lists/apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com_debian_security.debian.org_dists_squeeze_updates_Release 029cf33e45b7b9262448c6066616eeb8ba2b454e /var/lib/apt/lists/apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com_debian_security.debian.org_dists_squeeze_updates_Release.gpg $ sudo rm -v /var/lib/apt/lists/apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com_debian_security.debian.org_dists_squeeze_updates_Release* removed `/var/lib/apt/lists/apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com_debian_security.debian.org_dists_squeeze_updates_Release' removed `/var/lib/apt/lists/apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com_debian_security.debian.org_dists_squeeze_updates_Release.gpg' $ sudo apt-get update Hit http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com squeeze Release.gpg Ign http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main Translation-en Ign http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main Translation-en_GB Hit http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com squeeze-updates Release.gpg Ign http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-updates/main Translation-en Ign http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-updates/main Translation-en_GB Get:1 http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com squeeze/updates Release.gpg [836 B] Ign http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates/main Translation-en Ign http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates/main Translation-en_GB Hit http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com squeeze-backports Release.gpg Hit http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/backports.debian.org/debian-backpo… squeeze-backports/main Translation-en Ign http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/debian/backports.debian.org/debian-backpo… squeeze-backports/main Translation-en_GB Hit http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com squeeze Release Hit http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com squeeze-updates Release Get:2 http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com squeeze/updates Release [86.9 kB] Hit http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com squeeze-backports Release Hit http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com squeeze/main Sources Hit http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com squeeze/main i386 Packages Hit http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com squeeze-updates/main i386 Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com squeeze-updates/main i386 Packages Get:3 http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com squeeze/updates/main i386 Packages [333 kB] Hit http://apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com squeeze-backports/main i386 Packages Fetched 87.8 kB in 0s (166 kB/s) Reading package lists... Done $ sha1sum /var/lib/apt/lists/apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com_debian_security.debian.org_dists_squeeze_updates_Release* 1ac68a320a585d0166a2e807bdf82fcc6c0e123c /var/lib/apt/lists/apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com_debian_security.debian.org_dists_squeeze_updates_Release 13c1c170f7b826a46253fbeb784b854de8046369 /var/lib/apt/lists/apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com_debian_security.debian.org_dists_squeeze_updates_Release.gpg I think I would suspect a mirroring problem at Debian rather than a problem with the apt-cacher. Cheers, Andy -- "I'm /extremely/ miffed about today's events and in my quest to try to make you understand the level of my unhappiness, I'm likely to use an awful lot of what we would call /violent sexual imagery/ and I just wanted to check that neither of you would be terribly offended by that." — Malcolm Tucker