Re: [bitfolk] Apt-get update 403

Hello, On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 02:27:42PM -0000, Jan Henkins wrote: http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian-backports/dists/lenny-backports/main/binary… = 404. Can't cache what's not there. Looking in http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian-backports/dists/lenny-backports/main/binary… the Packages.gz and .bz2 files are there and I'm not sure which end is responsible for asking for Packages vs. Packages.gz. I don't think it is. Both volatile and backports changed the way they do things recently, so I assume it's that. I haven't had time to look into it yet. http://wiki.debian.org/DebianVolatile http://lists.debian.org/debian-volatile-announce/2011/msg00000.html http://backports.debian.org/Instructions/ Every time someone gets an error message from apt-get they assume it's a problem with our apt-cacher, and it very rarely has been. :) Perhaps it *is* this time, but the quickest way to determine that is to make it work without using apt-cacher first. So, can someone give that a go? the apt-cacher is admittedly running on a VM that's still running etch and probably could benefit from being split off to its own up-to-date VM. So, if you can show me a working entry for lenny volatile that doesn't use the apt-cacher, it'll be easier for me to work out if the apt-cacher is at fault. You'd expect the above to be: deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian-volatile/ main contrib non-free but as discussed, I know volatile has changed, and maybe backports too. Cheers, Andy -- http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting