Hi,
I'm just considering deploying a Trixbox SIP phone exchange within a
Bitfolk VPS. I was wondering if anybody else has used their VPS for
either Trixbox or Asterisk. If so, how did it perform please and how
many users do you think it would scale to before I hit the limits of the
VPS please?
Thanks,
Paul.
Hi,
At approximately 0047Z this morning I was alerted that a customer
VPS on obstler could not be started. I investigated and was unable
to start the VPS myself. I attempted to start a test VPS on this
server and this failed in the same way.
At this point it seemed inevitable that a server reboot would be
required, so I tried restarting a few Xen-related services that I
normally wouldn't touch on a production server, in the hope that
this might fix things. Unfortunately it did not and only led to an
inability to cleanly shut down the VPSes that were still running.
So, at approximately 0110Z I rebooted obstler, and all VPSes on it
will have experienced equivalent of power off and boot again. Boot
and start of all VPSes was completed by 0123Z, but a few VPSes were
still running fsck at that point. As of now, BitFolk's Nagios shows
no more red than it was before the reboot.
I still do not know the root cause of the problem, though it seems
likely to be a bug in Xen. The server obstler is in need of upgrade
to a newer version of Xen; this is scheduled for some time in
January, and I would think it unlikely that this will reoccur before
then (last reboot for this server was in July, under similar
circumstances).
Apologies for the disruption.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
Hello,
As you may be aware, Ubuntu 10.10 has just been released.
BitFolk will be offering it as a supported VPS image, but it's not
ready yet.
You should be able to upgrade to it, but I would urge caution.
Ubuntu's support of Xen has not historically been that great and
something unexpected could happen. If you are going to try this then
I would strongly urge you to email support and ask for a snapshot to
first be made of your block devices. If all goes wrong then it can
be quickly and easily rolled back.
When the 10.10 image is ready we should also in most cases be able
to provide you with a new VPS running 10.10 concurrently with your
existing VPS for two weeks at no additional charge, for you to
migrate to. You would need to pick a new account name, and IP
addresses will change. Please contact support if you wish to do that.
Please note the support schedule for Ubuntu releases and that 10.04
as currently offered by BitFolk is an LTS release, unlike 10.10. If
you upgrade to 10.10 then you're most likely going to also have to
upgrade to every other release in turn, to get to the next LTS.
If there is no external requirement to upgrade to 10.10 then you
might consider it prudent to wait until the next LTS is released
instead.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
"I am the permanent milk monitor of all hobbies!" -- Simon Quinlank
Hi all,
I am hosting a public asterisk box as backup support for some clients.
Most annoyingly since a few days I get hundreds of sip register probes
per minute.
I have fail2ban active which bans the ip, but it seems to be some sort
of bot network which immediately switches to another IP.
Needless to say, it is a pain.
As clients' phones register against the server (coming from dynamic ips)
I can't easily move to a different port or so ;(
Has anyone got any good suggestions?
Conrad
Hi guys,
I seem to be having some issues with getting postfix installed on my VPS, I
have been to the Ubuntu forums, the mailing list and IRC just now.
The problem is laid out here: http://pastebin.com/umgcf0iM
dpkg seems to be having problems, here is what the people on IRC suggested,
all of which worked to no avail:
-Change to official repos (rather than the bitfolk ones)
-apt-get remove postfix, apt-get clean, apt-get update, apt-get install
postfix (All of which worked to no avail)
-df -h - showed 78% full, 1.6GB left
And finally:
$ dpkg --contents /var/cache/apt/archives/postfix_2.7.0-1_i386.deb
dpkg-deb: failed to read archive
`/var/cache/apt/archives/postfix_2.7.0-1_i386.deb': No such file or
directory
So, I'm out of ideas :S ...whats going wrong?
Daniel
Hi folks,
At approximately 2136Z this evening, unrelated provider maintenance
work in the colo dislodged a power cord to one of the switches,
causing approximately 10 minutes of network outage for customers on
the following servers:
barbar
dunkel
kwak
Host corona in the same rack was unaffected because it is connected
to a different switch.
There are two switches in each rack in order to provide redundancy,
but unfortunately it has only recently become part of our standard
install procedure to use bonded network interfaces.
kwak and corona are due for an OS reinstall and when this is done
they will be set up with bonded interfaces. The same goes for these
older hosts in the other racks:
curacao
kahlua
obstler
dunkel and barbar will not require a reinstall for quite some time,
but this is not the first time that switch outages have bitten us
and I'm not happy with that, so I will be scheduling a short
maintenance in the next couple of months to reconfigure these hosts
for bonded network interfaces. This also goes for faustino.
The newest servers, urquell and cosmo, have both been installed with
bonded network interfaces; this is our standard install practice at
the moment.
Please accept my apologies for the disruption and be assured that we
have learned some lessons from this.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
Hi All,
does anyone have any experience with any ssh client that operates through https?
Ideally, I'd use it for hotels or net cafes which do not have a windows putty
client, to log into my VPS. I'd host the server on myvps.com, so
<https://www.myvps.com> would take me to log in to my VPS.
Any help appreciated.
Cheers,
Max
Hi,
As requested in issue #25:
https://tools.bitfolk.com/redmine/issues/25
I've implemented the editing of reverse DNS for your IPs. See:
https://panel.bitfolk.com/dns/
You can update simple reverse DNS entries or set a delegation to
other DNS servers.
I am aware that the method for setting up a delegation is a bit
clunky, but it works. My reasoning for deploying it in this state is
that typically you set up a delegation once and then leave it alone,
so it's not like you would be using this part of the interface very
often.
A more pleasing interface would be a more complicated HTML form
where you can dynamically add and delete rows. I didn't want the
deployment of the simple reverse DNS update feature to have to wait
for that. I've created a new issue for that:
https://tools.bitfolk.com/redmine/issues/43
Again, IPv6 support isn't present yet either, for similar reasons:
very few customers appear to be actively using IPv6, even fewer have
IPv6 reverse DNS set up. Reverse DNS delegations for this will
continue to be set up by support ticket for now.
The same page also currently has a read-only display of the DNS
domains you have set up for secondary DNS on BitFolk's nameservers.
That's part of issue #2:
https://tools.bitfolk.com/redmine/issues/2
and will eventually become the place to add, modify and delete those
settings instead of having to create a support ticket.
I think the next most pressing issue is #7, "Reimage VPS from
panel":
https://tools.bitfolk.com/redmine/issues/7
so that's what I'll focus on next. That's a pretty big one though so
I'll probably also try to get some of the other things done at the
same time.
As usual, please feel free to have a browse of the issues list:
https://tools.bitfolk.com/redmine/projects/bitfolk/issues?query_id=1
Log in with the usual credentials to create new issues and to vote
existing ones up/down. I can't promise to always implement things in
the order wanted, but knowing which features are most desired is
very useful.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
Hello,
I'm running bind9 on Ubuntu 10.04. It seems to start up normally, but
it doesn't return anything when I try to check that it's serving the
right zone file:
$ dig ilovephilosophy.com @212.13.195.254
; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-APPLE-P2 <<>> ilovephilosophy.com @212.13.195.254
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 3625
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;ilovephilosophy.com. IN A
;; Query time: 105 msec
;; SERVER: 212.13.195.254#53(212.13.195.254)
;; WHEN: Wed Oct 13 14:22:04 2010
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 37
The 'SERVFAIL' and the lack of an answer section suggest something's
wrong, but how can I find out what specifically is missing?
Thanks,
Mike