Re: [bitfolk] SSH access to Xen Shell will have to be tighte…

Top Page
Author: Alun Jones
Date:  
To: Andy Smith
CC: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] SSH access to Xen Shell will have to be tightened up

Reply to this message
gpg: Signature made Fri Mar 2 17:53:06 2018 UTC
gpg: using RSA key 17CE11E90C6CDF5B07B173F291E17A53337B09CC
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 15:58:36 +0000
Andy Smith <andy@???> wrote:
>
> > Something I find useful: libpam-google-authenticator. I seem to
> > remember you're already using Google Authenticator for other
> > things, Andy, so it probably wouldn't take much extra work to set
> > up.
>
> This is already available. If you enable two factor auth then it
> asks for the Google authenticator code on SSH. Most people don't
> configure two factor auth, and many do not want to see it made
> mandatory.


I wonder what the feeling is if it's only mandatory for
password-based access, if the choice is between that and
key-only.

Cheers,
Alun.