Re: [bitfolk] SSH access to Xen Shell will have to be tighte…

Top Page
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] SSH access to Xen Shell will have to be tightened up

Reply to this message
gpg: Signature made Fri Mar 2 15:58:36 2018 UTC
gpg: using DSA key 2099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Good signature from "Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andrew James Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (UKUUG) <andy.smith@ukuug.org>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (BitFolk Ltd.) <andy@bitfolk.com>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Linux User Groups UK) <andy@lug.org.uk>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Cernio Technology Cooperative) <andy.smith@cernio.com>" [unknown]
Hello,

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 02:38:56PM +0000, Alun Jones wrote:
> Something I find useful: libpam-google-authenticator. I seem to remember
> you're already using Google Authenticator for other things, Andy, so
> it probably wouldn't take much extra work to set up.


This is already available. If you enable two factor auth then it
asks for the Google authenticator code on SSH. Most people don't
configure two factor auth, and many do not want to see it made
mandatory.

Cheers,
Andy

--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting