I'm with the consensus here - the mild inconvenience that I can warn my
web-app users about in advance is more than an OK given the importance of
security updates. Also given it leaks a different bit of memory each time
it could be repetitively used until something useful is retrieved.
On 15 Dec 2016 11:12 am, "Murray Crane" <murray.crane@???> wrote:
> Yeah, that. Will never complain about Andy taking security seriously.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Murray Crane
>
> On 15 December 2016 at 11:08, Paul Tansom <paul@???> wrote:
>
>> ** Andreas Olsson <andreas@???> [2016-12-14 13:42]:
>> > ons 2016-12-14 klockan 13:21 +0000 skrev Alun:
>> > > Andy Smith <andy@???> said, in message
>> > > 20161214124152.GU21587@???:
>> > > >
>> > …perhaps I could have a bit of feedback from you as to whether we
>> > > > did the right thing in enforcing a reboot here.
>> >
>> >
>> > I'm all for these short notice reboots[*]. Partly because of the
>> > rather-safe-than-sorry scenario expressed by Alun. Partly because it's
>> > 2016, and we really should know how to build our virtual infrastructure
>> > in such a way that it survives the occasional reboots. Especially if
>> > they are advised a head of time.
>> >
>> > // Andreas
>> ** end quote [Andreas Olsson]
>>
>> Seconded, thirded, or however many we are up to now :)
>>
>> --
>> Paul Tansom | Aptanet Ltd. | https://www.aptanet.com/ | 023 9238
>> 0001
>> Vice Chair, FSB Portsmouth & SE Hampshire Branch |
>> http://www.fsb.org.uk/
>> ============================================================
>> =================
>> Registered in England | Company No: 4905028 | Registered Office: Ralls
>> House,
>> Parklands Business Park, Forrest Road, Denmead, Waterlooville, Hants, PO7
>> 6XP
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> users@???
>> https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@???
> https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
