Re: [bitfolk] Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Murray Crane
Date:  
To: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Thanks Matt/Hugo.

scponly sounds perfect, will go have a look.

Kind regards

Kind regards

Murray Crane

On 3 September 2015 at 16:50, Mail Delivery Subsystem <
mailer-daemon@???> wrote:

> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
>      hugo-bf@???

>
> Technical details of permanent failure:
> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server
> for the recipient domain carfax.org.uk by mail.carfax.org.uk.
> [2001:ba8:1f1:f1d9:216:3eff:fe14:aef9].
>
> The error that the other server returned was:
> 550 Unrouteable address
>
>
> ----- Original message -----
>
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>         d=gmail.com; s=20120113;

>
> h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
>          :content-type;
>         bh=qUsmRotgDrePcgGkI3DnWeS619sY44YzDcMeKhOU5v4=;

>
> b=J+zTvt9/Iedp7OimfHkFm/PpIQhGZzoe5DHLC/pS+a8oG7urV/0dlNyrRZZzFlAQqK
>
> sECRimLaeNqtpGSk98+W+cs1VkDq4ecclWGmtcZqh9QV+o0CYXtn5ijgW/9DY5We9vmi
>
> AQJoWjo1snV2eqTZ/6eVUN4eft3NVD2hOFcFf09oYWGRLcz1u91e/G5SbBx72Tytv0uZ
>
> kxKRCYWIQaEXIwpgboZZPJRZdnWh8pz2BCCrZsrEo7cHUGUFneL4cf8TWxTtkSFgtFBo
>
>  XnYtLHyqnBgJG7Lq9MnGloDCD3Zg8d8eUs5prVbKCPgcBmcihinHrO4ln8oQ0h1WhTDQ
>          uovw==
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Received: by 10.112.170.129 with SMTP id
> am1mr22610658lbc.116.1441295439506;
>  Thu, 03 Sep 2015 08:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.112.53.4 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 08:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
> In-Reply-To: <20150903154935.GH11358@???>
> References: <CAAiW_G=sCOXr3g+0KzTpkJmuZYpfDLRY4O3zovk4a0BKEWt=
> Jw@???>
>         <20150903154935.GH11358@???>
> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:50:39 +0100
> Message-ID: <CAAiW_GkyVwYG4WeNnrC3-ThYSnwUuDLyTOezJEO1=
> c3-G0a7Uw@???>
> Subject: Re: [bitfolk] SSH query
> From: Murray Crane <murray.crane@???>
> To: Hugo Mills <hugo-bf@???>
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c372eab03a74051ed9bee9

>
> Thanks Matt/Hugo.
>
> scponly sounds perfect, will go have a look.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Murray Crane
>
> On 3 September 2015 at 16:49, Hugo Mills <hugo-bf@???> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 04:42:27PM +0100, Murray Crane wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Hoping to crowdsource your knowledge.
> > >
> > > In Ubuntu/Debian, is it possible to set up the www-data user with SSH
> > > access (for development purposes; read/write to the web server document
> > > root) but not "shell access" otherwise?
> > >
> > > The SSH will be pub-key only, but I already know how to do such things
> > (to
> > > avoid obvious "do it key only" suggestions).
> > > Kind regards
> >
> >    There's a project called scponly that you can use to set this
> > up. You set it as the login shell for the account, and it implements
> > the absolute minimum that a shell needs to do to support scp, without
> > giving any kind of interactive access.

> >
> >    Hugo.

> >
> > > Murray Crane
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > users mailing list
> > > users@???
> > > https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> >
> > --
> > Hugo Mills             | I spent most of my money on drink, women and
> fast
> > hugo@... carfax.org.uk | cars. The rest I wasted.
> > http://carfax.org.uk/  |
> > PGP: E2AB1DE4          |                                            James
> > Hunt

> >
>