Re: [bitfolk] rsync between VPS's for backup

Top Page
Author: Hugo Mills
Date:  
To: Matthew Moore
CC: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] rsync between VPS's for backup

Reply to this message
gpg: Signature made Thu Aug 29 09:17:50 2013 UTC
gpg: using RSA key 585E1475E2AB1DE4
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:00:01AM +0100, Matthew Moore wrote:
> On 29/08/13 09:46, Murray Crane wrote:
> > Just "testing the waters" at this juncture, making sure that our plan
> > isn't going to make Andy angry or anything like that.
> >
> > I have two VPS's with bitfolk; my personal one and one that I am
> > donating to the virtual airline I am currently president of (on
> > separate servers). I'm thinking that for the purposes of backup of the
> > VA VPS, I can rsync the web folder over to a holding area on my
> > personal VPS on a daily basis, and do more traditional "everything"
> > backups (again, rsync) less frequently.
> >
> > Is this feasible/considered an "OK" thing to do (Andy)? Would I be
> > better off raising a support ticket to have the backups done by
> > Bitfolk (assumes you're not already, o'course)?
>
> Personally (I'm not Andy) I'd say that its your bandwidth, that you've
> paid for so you can do what you want with it.


IIRC (and again, I'm not Andy), if you're transferring between
Bitfolk VPSes, that data doesn't traverse Bitfolk's uplink to the rest
of the internet, so they don't pay for the bytes, so I think the
transfer doesn't even get accounted for.

Hugo.

-- 
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
  PGP key: 65E74AC0 from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
     --- For months now, we have been making triumphant retreats ---     
               before a demoralised enemy who is advancing               
                           in utter disorder.