Re: [bitfolk] Minecraft (Was tedious editor wars, was Re: i…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: john lewis
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Minecraft (Was tedious editor wars, was Re: iptables front-end?)
to
>> Telstra)
>>     seem not to be routed upstream. From my VPS I get:

>
> Telstra are definitely announcing 1.120.0.0/13 as a prefix to the
> global
> BGP routing tables.
>
> AS PATH 1221>4637>[Level3/Cogent/Sprint/Hurricane Electric/Easynet
> Global/other large transity type usual suspects]
>
> From a Virgin Media connection I can trace 1.125.81.4 well into
> Telstra
> network (Adelaide) and from my work connection I also get a similar
> path
> [Virgin via C&W and work via Level3]
>
> Suspect an issue closer to home with peering/transit.
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@???
> https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users




From andy@??? Wed Dec 05 15:47:31 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1TgHC7-0000iz-4D
    for users@???; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:47:31 +0000
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:47:30 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20121205154730.GK28016@???>
References: <CALc5WvNbgxzYMOMRUSq-0pKkeuO9MHzt82qoJOpa=_1TVi37YQ@???>
    <65D0C393-742B-4E3B-A817-8D0511A52F87@???>
    <CALc5WvOrU2Qam_97n9CdrJWFXarj_UuxvWCM=4T=fxR9ZmRQLw@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
    protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALc5WvOrU2Qam_97n9CdrJWFXarj_UuxvWCM=4T=fxR9ZmRQLw@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
    05 Dec 2012 15:47:31 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
    autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Routing issues
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:47:31 -0000



--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 11:24:22AM +0000, Matthew Daubney wrote:
> This machine is also in that range. How annoying! What's the normal method
> of resolving these? Harass Telstra?


Th