id 655154C0B3
for <users@???>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 13:56:20 +0000 (GMT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:56:20 +0000
From: jan@???
To: <users@???>
In-Reply-To: <50BF3DFB.8040704@???>
References: <CALc5WvNbgxzYMOMRUSq-0pKkeuO9MHzt82qoJOpa=_1TVi37YQ@???>
<65D0C393-742B-4E3B-A817-8D0511A52F87@???>
<CALc5WvOrU2Qam_97n9CdrJWFXarj_UuxvWCM=4T=fxR9ZmRQLw@???>
<50BF3DFB.8040704@???>
Message-ID: <6b2430130ec197de3fc954de9c6e7ae5@???>
X-Sender: jan@???
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/RCMAIL_VERSION
X-bitfolk.com-Metrics-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for
2001:ba8:1f1:f0ef:216:3eff:fe14:ae03 (failed)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
05 Dec 2012 13:56:21 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:ba8:1f1:f0ef:216:3eff:fe14:ae03
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jan@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run,
due to a shortcircuited rule
* -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Routing issues
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:56:22 -0000
I'm aware of some broken fibre hassles last night (GMT) in the Sydney
area that affected international bandwidth going via the US. It is
possible that the problem below is as a result of this event, and that
the dynamic routing did not rebuild properly after the fibre was fixed.
As it is, our routing to our Oz office at /dev/work still goes via a DR
link.
On 2012-12-05 12:28, Phil Clarke wrote:
> On 05/12/2012 11:24, Matthew Daubney wrote:
>> This machine is also in that range. How annoying! What's the normal
>> method of resolving these? Harass Telstra?
>>
>> (forgot to reply all)
>>
>>
>> On 5 December 2012 11:19, Michael Watkin <michael@???
>> <mailto:michael@pasdex.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I raised this with Andy as IPs in the 1.125.0.0/16
>> <http://1.125.0.0/16> range (which has been allocated to
>> Telstra)
>> seem not to be routed upstream. From my VPS I get:
>
> Telstra are definitely announcing 1.120.0.0/13 as a prefix to the
> global
> BGP routing tables.
>
> AS PATH 1221>4637>[Level3/Cogent/Sprint/Hurricane Electric/Easynet
> Global/other large transity type usual suspects]
>
> From a Virgin Media connection I can trace 1.125.81.4 well into
> Telstra
> network (Adelaide) and from my work connection I also get a similar
> path
> [Virgin via C&W and work via Level3]
>
> Suspect an issue closer to home with peering/transit.
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@???
> https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users
From andy@??? Wed Dec 05 15:47:31 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1TgHC7-0000iz-4D
for users@???; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:47:31 +0000
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:47:30 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20121205154730.GK28016@???>
References: <CALc5WvNbgxzYMOMRUSq-0pKkeuO9MHzt82qoJOpa=_1TVi37YQ@???>
<65D0C393-742B-4E3B-A817-8D0511A52F87@???>
<CALc5WvOrU2Qam_97n9CdrJWFXarj_UuxvWCM=4T=fxR9ZmRQLw@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALc5WvOrU2Qam_97n9CdrJWFXarj_UuxvWCM=4T=fxR9ZmRQLw@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
05 Dec 2012 15:47:31 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Routing issues
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:47:31 -0000
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 11:24:22AM +0000, Matthew Daubney wrote:
> This machine is also in that range. How annoying! What's the normal method
> of resolving these? Harass Telstra?
This was down to a disagreement between Telstra and Jump over the
form of Telstra's announcement (an excessive number of prepends for
Jump's liking). I have asked Jump to put in an exception while they
argue over it and this has now been done, so it should be working
again.
Apologies for the disruption.
Cheers,
Andy
--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAlC/bJIACgkQIJm2TL8VSQt7uACfeY6NuN2zfZP4Ail5181QGLI/
ZgQAn1/xEBP2
